All Posts Tagged With: "Clintons"
Most Say Political Conventions Boring and Waste Of Time and Money
The Democrat Convention has a NASCAR race quality about it with viewers morbidly “hoping” for a BIG crash while eschewing that idea for political correctness.
Nearly half of U.S. voters (49%) think it is at least somewhat likely that Hillary Clinton will overshadow the Democrats’ presumptive presidential nominee Barack Obama at the party’s national political convention next week. Twenty-three percent (23%) say it is Very Likely. Even 44% of Democrats think it is at least somewhat likely to happen, including 18% who say it is Very Likely.
Nearly as many voters (47%) do not expect Mrs. Clinton to overshadow Obama, although only 8% say it is Not At All Likely. Most think Obama will outshine Bill Clinton Fifty-four percent (54%) of Democrats say it isn’t likely to happen, but only 10% say it won’t happen period. The Democrat Convention has a NASCAR race quality about it with viewers morbidly “hoping” for a BIG crash while eschewing that
idea for political correctness.
Mark J. Penn, Hillary Clinton’s chief adviser during much of her unsuccessful presidential bid said Tuesday, “This year, the party that wins the battle of the conventions will likely win the election.” 56% of Democrats say they are more likely to watch the conventions this year, versus 19% who say they are less likely to watch. With Obama expected to be the first African-American presidential candidate of a major national political party, 77% of black voters say they are more likely to watch the conventions this year. A black-centric television network said it will cover the Democrat Convention but ignore the Republican convention broadcast.
By contrast, more Republicans (40%) say they are less likely to watch the conventions than those who say they are more likely to do so (31%). Unaffiliated voters are more interested in conventions, too. Forty percent (40%) say they are more likely to watch this year, as opposed to 29% who describe themselves as less likely.
Fifty-two percent of voters describe political conventions in general as boring versus 32% who say they are exciting. More Democrats rate conventions as exciting (44%) than those who characterize them as boring (35%). For 64% of Republicans and 62% of unaffiliated voters, however, conventions are boring. The enthusiasm gap is likely produced by the simmering controversy between Clinton and Obama, and the possibility of a class in Denver but the absence of the same controversy at the Republican Convention in Minnesota.
More and more say McCain will make a surprise VP Nomination and more news by anouncing his cabinet - we will see.
Forty-nine percent of voters say conventions are a waste of time and money, while 30% think they are really necessary. Democrats are closely divided; with 36% saying conventions are a waste and 39% saying they are necessary. Once again, Republicans (59%) and unaffiliateds (54%) by high margins rate them more as a waste of time.
Derranged Narcissism of the Clintons Per CNNs Toobin
When Jeffrey Toobin called Hillary’s non concession speech, narcissism, applying it to the Clintons, not just her, his panel participants including Gloria Berger were stunned. She laughed nervously, as a moderate Democrat would under these non unity circumstances.
Another shook his head, as if he did not hear what Toobin said, or rather wished he had not heard. Party First Democrats are naturally concerned about lack of unity continuing into the race they should not loose, given the troubling circumstances in the economy and Iraq.
It does seem like Hillary continues to try to have it both ways. She is trying to support Barack adequately enough so as not to be a pariah in the party, but refusing to truly concede in unambiguous terms. Toobin and Richard Cochrane probably seldom agree but Cochrane’s earlier article, is consistent with Toobin’s current assessment.
The campaign is officially SUSPENDED, not ENDED.
Some headlines report that Hillary says Democrats must unite behind Barack Obama. Have it your way Hillary.
THE CLINTONS AT TWILIGHT

I have a message for Bill and Hillary Clinton: You fought the good fight and lost. You fought the bad fight and still lost. It’s OK if you want to play out the string, take a last, not-quite-victory lap across the country, just keep it clean. Go ahead and raise a few bucks so you can repay Hillary’s campaign debts without dipping into Chelsea’s dowry. Your fellow Democrats are perfectly cool with that.
But don’t fool yourselves. Don’t think you are only one well-placed, low blow from the nomination and you owe it to your supporters to hit Barack in his. It is all over but the shouting and if you give a damn about your legacies you’ll keep the shouting down to a nice, soft goodbye.
It’s up to the party now. If the superdelegates and fixers conspire to take the nomination away from Obama it will be out of the Democratic party’s cold, dead fingers. No matter what they think about Barack’s chances come November, denying him his rightful, hard-earned prize would be a capital crime for the Democrats. It would make a mockery out of the very name of the party of Jefferson.
The Clintons can make sure that travesty never happens. I am hopeful they will. I believe Hillary already sees the handwriting on the wall, and when she lets herself read it, she’ll Do The Right Thing. I don’t think the Clintons are bad people, just driven, but, to torture the metaphor, they’re about out of gas and it’s time for them to stop before they drive us to distraction.
This has been an uncomfortable campaign season for me. I hate to hate the Clintons. That’s how I know I’m not a Republican, they love to hate the Clintons.
And who can blame them? This hick, slick-talking upstart grabs the White House from Prescott Bush’s kid, spends half his eight years tripping over his own wang, and still manages to stop the Gingrich revolution in its tracks, stain a few intern’s dresses, avoid impeachment, and leave with popularity numbers higher than George W before he found AA.
People say Bill Clinton didn’t get much accomplished in eight years, but they’re dead wrong. He played the greatest game of defense in contemporary political history.
Bill Clinton didn’t kill the Republican revolution—George W Bush did that—but he kept it in check for eight, long years. With the House and Senate and most statehouses against him, he held the line. He refused to lose. That is his strength, that is Hillary’s strength.
Now we will see if it is also their fatal weakness. Because it is time to lose, with grace, with dignity, without wounding the party they’ve done so much to bring back to health.
Bill and Hillary Clinton, you have been of great service to your country. We know that this has been a long, hard campaign and you felt the need to say and do some harsh things along the way. It’s just business, we understand. No hard feelings. All is forgiven.
Now go home.
Clinton’s Sabre-rattling - Foolish, Dangerous
Hillary Clinton’s ill-advised threat that if she were in the White House she would nuke Iran if it attacks Israel, UAE, Saudi Arabia or Dubai broke new ground, and shocked many foreign policy experts as pugnacious. The U. S. has consistently said it will react aggressively to any such attack on Israel but has tempered such comments. Clinton’s overt threat raises questions of payback for millions in contribution to her husband’s library by Saudis, Dubai and IAE interests and her husband’s multi million lobbying contract with Dubai.
Heretofore Iran is known to have looked forward to another Clinton presidency or an Obama regime believing either would be more malleable as it seeks to delay any action to hinder its full speed quest for nuclear weapons.


