<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hypocrisy Reigns Supreme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hypocrisy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hypocrisy.com</link>
	<description>Political Essays, Satires, Irony, Rascality, and Life</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Killing of Trayvon Martin by proletarian</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2012/05/10/the-killing-of-trayvon-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-22458</link>
		<dc:creator>proletarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 00:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=13653#comment-22458</guid>
		<description>Hey Snark, you double posted this. Anyway, here's a couple facts for you. 90% of shooting of blacks are commmitted by blacks. Over 90% of blacks harbor racial animosity or downright abhorrence of the white race. Therefore, they would be considered racists. Simply pointing out facts, and yes I'm speaking from empirical experience as I am in a racial marriage myself and have been for forty-two years. Not trying to be one-sided here, not trying to take the white-man's stance, simply pointing out the makeup of America.

The Trayvon/Zimmerman shooting has been propelled to stellar heights by these same racists, e.g., Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, et al. Others, such as the media, or should I say chaos merchants, have also emblazoned Americans with their slant and bias. This is a simple one to understand however. It's about the liberal, or progressive agenda with regard to gun control. The mainstream media, at the behest of "certain" political components, want to progress with gun control in the next term. What better way is there than to incite the sensibility of the American people. After all, didn't our "honorable"  Justice Department just get caught with their pants around their ankles with "Fast and Furious?" Aren't they doing their best, and I can assure you many are buying it, to duck and dodge what really happened -- and their culpablity? This type of scenario happens time and time again, going on time immorial with these people. Look what they have done to the trucking industry. Are not the poor truck drivers viewed as a lot of philistines in today's times. It wasn't always that way. Farmers, engineers, retired salesman and many others from copious walks of life drove trucks thirty, forty years ago -- no one disparaged them back then. Today -- dregs of society they are. Simply a point made that I have noticed over the span of forty years in the industry. It's called plunder by law, another industry the government has raped.

However, let me digress. At the head of our federal government lies an agenda to curb ownership of guns in America. Now it really doesn't matter which side of the fence you are on in this issue, the real concern is more government encroachment on our freedoms and the systematic dismantling of our Constitution that's going on; what type of health care is to be mandated, what food are we not allowed eat, fuel we consume, education our children must or must not have, the amount of profits or pay we are granted, et al. 

At the crux of the Treyvon/Zimmerman debate, at the heart of the underlying agenda, is the urgency of the government to curb or abrogate the right to defend ourselves; the Stand Your Ground law. Government wishes to disarm Americans, have us rely on "law enforcement" (the government) for our protection. The statistical  average in America, the response time for law enforcement, is twelve minutes  A lot can happen in twelve minutes Mr. Snark, the case at hand is a good example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Snark, you double posted this. Anyway, here&#8217;s a couple facts for you. 90% of shooting of blacks are commmitted by blacks. Over 90% of blacks harbor racial animosity or downright abhorrence of the white race. Therefore, they would be considered racists. Simply pointing out facts, and yes I&#8217;m speaking from empirical experience as I am in a racial marriage myself and have been for forty-two years. Not trying to be one-sided here, not trying to take the white-man&#8217;s stance, simply pointing out the makeup of America.</p>
<p>The Trayvon/Zimmerman shooting has been propelled to stellar heights by these same racists, e.g., Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, et al. Others, such as the media, or should I say chaos merchants, have also emblazoned Americans with their slant and bias. This is a simple one to understand however. It&#8217;s about the liberal, or progressive agenda with regard to gun control. The mainstream media, at the behest of &#8220;certain&#8221; political components, want to progress with gun control in the next term. What better way is there than to incite the sensibility of the American people. After all, didn&#8217;t our &#8220;honorable&#8221;  Justice Department just get caught with their pants around their ankles with &#8220;Fast and Furious?&#8221; Aren&#8217;t they doing their best, and I can assure you many are buying it, to duck and dodge what really happened &#8212; and their culpablity? This type of scenario happens time and time again, going on time immorial with these people. Look what they have done to the trucking industry. Are not the poor truck drivers viewed as a lot of philistines in today&#8217;s times. It wasn&#8217;t always that way. Farmers, engineers, retired salesman and many others from copious walks of life drove trucks thirty, forty years ago &#8212; no one disparaged them back then. Today &#8212; dregs of society they are. Simply a point made that I have noticed over the span of forty years in the industry. It&#8217;s called plunder by law, another industry the government has raped.</p>
<p>However, let me digress. At the head of our federal government lies an agenda to curb ownership of guns in America. Now it really doesn&#8217;t matter which side of the fence you are on in this issue, the real concern is more government encroachment on our freedoms and the systematic dismantling of our Constitution that&#8217;s going on; what type of health care is to be mandated, what food are we not allowed eat, fuel we consume, education our children must or must not have, the amount of profits or pay we are granted, et al. </p>
<p>At the crux of the Treyvon/Zimmerman debate, at the heart of the underlying agenda, is the urgency of the government to curb or abrogate the right to defend ourselves; the Stand Your Ground law. Government wishes to disarm Americans, have us rely on &#8220;law enforcement&#8221; (the government) for our protection. The statistical  average in America, the response time for law enforcement, is twelve minutes  A lot can happen in twelve minutes Mr. Snark, the case at hand is a good example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eco-hypocrites taking the private jet to Copenhagen: by The Sexiest Environmentalists And The Ugliest Truths &#124; Green &#38; Clean</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2009/12/01/eco-hypocrites-taking-the-private-jet-to-copenhagen/comment-page-1/#comment-22455</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sexiest Environmentalists And The Ugliest Truths &#124; Green &#38; Clean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=10204#comment-22455</guid>
		<description>[...] eco-hypocrite attitude is exemplified perfectly by Dame Trudie Styler, described by Richard Cochrane as an “in-your-face global-warming campaigner,” film financier and wife of Sting, who along [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eco-hypocrite attitude is exemplified perfectly by Dame Trudie Styler, described by Richard Cochrane as an “in-your-face global-warming campaigner,” film financier and wife of Sting, who along [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The View vs. The Boy Scouts by Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2010/07/30/the-view-vs-the-boy-scouts/comment-page-1/#comment-22372</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=11072#comment-22372</guid>
		<description>President Obama is a wonderful family man... I don't understand how anyone could assert otherwise. What are the facts that might indicate otherwise? He's been married only once. He has a strong, loving, and supportive relationship with his wife and children. He advocates for the greater good. President Obama has more in common with Rockwell and All that is good about America than do many who purport to care about family values but do not walk the walk and who are exclusionary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is a wonderful family man&#8230; I don&#8217;t understand how anyone could assert otherwise. What are the facts that might indicate otherwise? He&#8217;s been married only once. He has a strong, loving, and supportive relationship with his wife and children. He advocates for the greater good. President Obama has more in common with Rockwell and All that is good about America than do many who purport to care about family values but do not walk the walk and who are exclusionary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil’s Dictionary; Revised and Updated by Snark Twain</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2012/03/11/the-devil%e2%80%99s-dictionary-revised-and-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-22361</link>
		<dc:creator>Snark Twain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=13564#comment-22361</guid>
		<description>Fine work, Prole!  I should have consulted you before I wrote the column!  Keep reading, my old friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine work, Prole!  I should have consulted you before I wrote the column!  Keep reading, my old friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil’s Dictionary; Revised and Updated by proletarian</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2012/03/11/the-devil%e2%80%99s-dictionary-revised-and-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-22360</link>
		<dc:creator>proletarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=13564#comment-22360</guid>
		<description>Snark my friend, I didn't know anyone ever read "The Devil's Dictionary" other than myself. Here's a couple, let me know what you think and I'll give you more.

Congress: 535 snollygosters and pettifoggers imbibed by the devil to plunder by law.

Love: Nympholepsy of the heart.

Human body: A carriage for the soul.

Aristocrat: A proper villain.

Hate: Unexpressed and often hidden brickbats that roam the mind.

Associate: One who thinks you an ass but tolerates you nonetheless.

Friend: One who "knows" you're an ass and loves you anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snark my friend, I didn&#8217;t know anyone ever read &#8220;The Devil&#8217;s Dictionary&#8221; other than myself. Here&#8217;s a couple, let me know what you think and I&#8217;ll give you more.</p>
<p>Congress: 535 snollygosters and pettifoggers imbibed by the devil to plunder by law.</p>
<p>Love: Nympholepsy of the heart.</p>
<p>Human body: A carriage for the soul.</p>
<p>Aristocrat: A proper villain.</p>
<p>Hate: Unexpressed and often hidden brickbats that roam the mind.</p>
<p>Associate: One who thinks you an ass but tolerates you nonetheless.</p>
<p>Friend: One who &#8220;knows&#8221; you&#8217;re an ass and loves you anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chilian Volcano Has Belched more Carbon Dioxide Than all Humans Have in Last two Decades. by Timmy Bippy</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/16/chilian-volcano-has-belched-more-carbon-dioxide-than-all-humans-have-in-last-two-decades/comment-page-9/#comment-22356</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy Bippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=1290#comment-22356</guid>
		<description>oh yeah - one more thing, in the 1970s the corporate sham media widely publicized the danger of a fast-approaching ice age!  It was a unanimous consensus!  oh no!  Look into who funds these so-called scientists and you will see they are all biased - every single one.  Even the scientific journals are owned and slanted by money or foundations supported by big corporate money.  It's a control-scam people, wake up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah - one more thing, in the 1970s the corporate sham media widely publicized the danger of a fast-approaching ice age!  It was a unanimous consensus!  oh no!  Look into who funds these so-called scientists and you will see they are all biased - every single one.  Even the scientific journals are owned and slanted by money or foundations supported by big corporate money.  It&#8217;s a control-scam people, wake up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chilian Volcano Has Belched more Carbon Dioxide Than all Humans Have in Last two Decades. by Timmy Bippy</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/16/chilian-volcano-has-belched-more-carbon-dioxide-than-all-humans-have-in-last-two-decades/comment-page-9/#comment-22355</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy Bippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=1290#comment-22355</guid>
		<description>Oil is a filthy destructive fuel that empowers the elite, increases food prices, and destroys our water, land, and air.  Humanity and the environment would benefit as a whole from a viable alternative.  Nevertheless "global warming" is an absolute sham cooked up by carbon taxing scammers to bleed carbon-taxation revenue out of everyone and control reproduction and population.  This is not a "liberal" or "conservative" issue - thinking within this two party paradigm destroys your freedom to think, and it allows the corporate media and the elite to control the entire debate and all the choices!!!  Water vapor accounts for over 80% of all greenhouse atmospheric effects, and more Americans die of prescription drugs in one year (over 20,000) then have EVER DIED OF TERRORISM!  Wake up people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil is a filthy destructive fuel that empowers the elite, increases food prices, and destroys our water, land, and air.  Humanity and the environment would benefit as a whole from a viable alternative.  Nevertheless &#8220;global warming&#8221; is an absolute sham cooked up by carbon taxing scammers to bleed carbon-taxation revenue out of everyone and control reproduction and population.  This is not a &#8220;liberal&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; issue - thinking within this two party paradigm destroys your freedom to think, and it allows the corporate media and the elite to control the entire debate and all the choices!!!  Water vapor accounts for over 80% of all greenhouse atmospheric effects, and more Americans die of prescription drugs in one year (over 20,000) then have EVER DIED OF TERRORISM!  Wake up people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chilian Volcano Has Belched more Carbon Dioxide Than all Humans Have in Last two Decades. by Mike Jonas</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/16/chilian-volcano-has-belched-more-carbon-dioxide-than-all-humans-have-in-last-two-decades/comment-page-9/#comment-22352</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=1290#comment-22352</guid>
		<description>paul - For a view of temperature &#38; CO2 over the last 600 million years see:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100103072337/http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/historical_CO2.html
(click on the graph to get an enlarged version)

There's more discussion of it here:
http://sbvor.blogspot.com.au/2008/04/is-co2-primary-driver-of-climate-change.html

Re your comment about "terrible times for life" and the planet recovering : the best times for life have been the warm periods and the periods of high CO2 concentration. High CO2 delivers high plant growth hence abundant animal food (think: massive dinosaurs). Viewed on the 600-million-year timescale, CO2 concentration is currently about as low as it has ever been. So "terrible times" means the glacial periods, and "recovering" means warming up. Very low CO2 could theoretically deliver "terrible times", but that appears not to have happened yet.

I'm not sure about "other chemicals" in the atmosphere over time. It does seem a very good idea not to emit much of the ones we know to be toxic, and CO2 is not one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul - For a view of temperature &amp; CO2 over the last 600 million years see:<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20100103072337/http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/historical_CO2.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20100103072337/http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/historical_CO2.html</a><br />
(click on the graph to get an enlarged version)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more discussion of it here:<br />
<a href="http://sbvor.blogspot.com.au/2008/04/is-co2-primary-driver-of-climate-change.html" rel="nofollow">http://sbvor.blogspot.com.au/2008/04/is-co2-primary-driver-of-climate-change.html</a></p>
<p>Re your comment about &#8220;terrible times for life&#8221; and the planet recovering : the best times for life have been the warm periods and the periods of high CO2 concentration. High CO2 delivers high plant growth hence abundant animal food (think: massive dinosaurs). Viewed on the 600-million-year timescale, CO2 concentration is currently about as low as it has ever been. So &#8220;terrible times&#8221; means the glacial periods, and &#8220;recovering&#8221; means warming up. Very low CO2 could theoretically deliver &#8220;terrible times&#8221;, but that appears not to have happened yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about &#8220;other chemicals&#8221; in the atmosphere over time. It does seem a very good idea not to emit much of the ones we know to be toxic, and CO2 is not one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chilian Volcano Has Belched more Carbon Dioxide Than all Humans Have in Last two Decades. by paul</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/16/chilian-volcano-has-belched-more-carbon-dioxide-than-all-humans-have-in-last-two-decades/comment-page-9/#comment-22350</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=1290#comment-22350</guid>
		<description>im no scientist or clever guy but i do have a question on climate change millions of years ago was the planet not warmer and also had more co2 and other chemicals in the atmosphere in the time of the dinosaures the plants used most of the co2 and produced most oxygen and the planet recoverd has the planet not seen terrible times for life and has always pulled through and yet we have lived on the planet not even a blink of an eye and we see the worse i really dont think so i do think we add crap to the planet but the crap has always been here :) haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im no scientist or clever guy but i do have a question on climate change millions of years ago was the planet not warmer and also had more co2 and other chemicals in the atmosphere in the time of the dinosaures the plants used most of the co2 and produced most oxygen and the planet recoverd has the planet not seen terrible times for life and has always pulled through and yet we have lived on the planet not even a blink of an eye and we see the worse i really dont think so i do think we add crap to the planet but the crap has always been here <img src='http://hypocrisy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chilian Volcano Has Belched more Carbon Dioxide Than all Humans Have in Last two Decades. by John Theophilus</title>
		<link>http://hypocrisy.com/2008/06/16/chilian-volcano-has-belched-more-carbon-dioxide-than-all-humans-have-in-last-two-decades/comment-page-9/#comment-22348</link>
		<dc:creator>John Theophilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocrisy.com/?p=1290#comment-22348</guid>
		<description>We now have the "scandal" that Heartlands is funding anthropogenic climate change denial research, which is presented as proof positive that anyone doubting the dodgy conventional wisdom supported by overwhelming government funded research is a charletan and a rogue.  Put me down for C &#38; R status!
When a complicated scientific question is kicked about in a political maelstrom it will never be resolved logically on the basis of fact.  The Phlogiston theory of combustion hung around for the best part of a century after it's fundamental flaws had been fully demonstrated, supported by the politics of the science community of the day.
It is (just) conceivable that humanity could do something about climate change (either work out how to reduce any antropogenic effects or prepare for natural cyclical changes) but in my view all we will actually do is have spats about who is doing what underhand thing to whom while the lifeboat gently settles beneath the waves!
Ho hum, happy days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now have the &#8220;scandal&#8221; that Heartlands is funding anthropogenic climate change denial research, which is presented as proof positive that anyone doubting the dodgy conventional wisdom supported by overwhelming government funded research is a charletan and a rogue.  Put me down for C &amp; R status!<br />
When a complicated scientific question is kicked about in a political maelstrom it will never be resolved logically on the basis of fact.  The Phlogiston theory of combustion hung around for the best part of a century after it&#8217;s fundamental flaws had been fully demonstrated, supported by the politics of the science community of the day.<br />
It is (just) conceivable that humanity could do something about climate change (either work out how to reduce any antropogenic effects or prepare for natural cyclical changes) but in my view all we will actually do is have spats about who is doing what underhand thing to whom while the lifeboat gently settles beneath the waves!<br />
Ho hum, happy days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
