First because I can’t seem to get this slide to work of Henry Waxman’s three page Kruschev style letter that makes Gene McCarthy seem like a boaster on the playground saying my dad can beat your dad up.
And second because the letter and it’s author deserves formal censure by the House Of Representatives for it’s commission of government abuse and political extortion, and it’s omissions.
Chief…Go into Edit Mode for this article, copy the HTML from Visual Mode then flick to HTML Mode(using the tab at top right), delete everything, and then Paste it there. Flick back to Visual Mode(tab at top right), save it by updating your post and this will work. I’ve also tested this on my site in Preview using this same method. I copied your post — which is HTML and did all the above and previewed it on my site successfully.
Im not a scientist ( I'm a truck driver / mechanic / heavy equipment operator ), I have a slightly ... Justin Cosby | 13Sep12 | More
Ah Snark, perhaps one of your best articles yet. I do agree, there are two factors facing our great society, ... proletarian | 5Aug12 | More
Well, there's no way you or anyone else would know if Zimmerman was "hot under the collar" or not. Purly ... proletarian | 1Aug12 | More
Yeah, revolution is the ultimate solution, but unfortunately for the current batch of sheep most don't even realize they ... Schwack | 31Jul12 | More
Don't Re-nig in 2012 does that somehow have nonthig whatsoever to do with the tea party?? Also, ... Tavito | 11Jul12 | More
Hey Snark, you double posted this. Anyway, here's a couple facts for you. 90% of shooting of blacks are commmitted ... proletarian | 11May12 | More
President Obama is a wonderful family man... I don't understand how anyone could assert otherwise. What are the facts that ... Sabrina | 10Apr12 | More
Fine work, Prole! I should have consulted you before I wrote the column! Keep reading, my old friend. Snark Twain | 19Mar12 | More
Snark my friend, I didn't know anyone ever read "The Devil's Dictionary" other than myself. Here's a couple, let me ... proletarian | 16Mar12 | More
oh yeah - one more thing, in the 1970s the corporate sham media widely publicized the danger of a fast-approaching ... Timmy Bippy | 7Mar12 | More
Oil is a filthy destructive fuel that empowers the elite, increases food prices, and destroys our water, land, and air. ... Timmy Bippy | 7Mar12 | More
paul - For a view of temperature & CO2 over the last 600 million years see:
(click on the graph to ... Mike Jonas | 1Mar12 | More
im no scientist or clever guy but i do have a question on climate change millions of years ago was ... paul | 27Feb12 | More
We now have the "scandal" that Heartlands is funding anthropogenic climate change denial research, which is presented as proof positive ... John Theophilus | 15Feb12 | More
If I owe $100 to Tom but Harry owes me $100, the situation is the same as if Harry owed ... zam | 7Feb12 | More
Again, if you don't mind, a short follow-up Mr. Snark. Please forgive me for being so circumlocutory in my response. ... proletarian | 28Jan12 | More
Hey Snark, good to hear from you. I have a confession to tell. Whether I agree or disagree with your ... proletarian | 28Jan12 | More
Now don't do anything drastic, Prole! I remember some of my more fringy friends on the left wing fringe ... Snark Twain | 26Jan12 | More
Dave - you are quite right. I have tried a few times to explain to Joel that the issue is ... Mike Jonas | 21Jan12 | More
Joel and Mike: Gentlemen, you're getting hung up on the wrong issue. The issue is NOT the validity or ... Dave | 21Jan12 | More
Sorry Mr. Snark, I'd like to do a little follow-up if you don't mind. I refuse to vote for Mitt, ... proletarian | 13Jan12 | More
Oh, my, my, my, Mr. Snark -- always a pleasure to read you. As usual you have been very eloquent ... proletarian | 13Jan12 | More
Joel - your habit of portraying criticisms of scientists' work as ad hominems is getting ridiculous.
All of the data used ... Mike Jonas | 4Jan12 | More
You claim BEST used the same data as previous studies. This is disingenuous and borders on a lie. ... Joel | 4Jan12 | More
Happy New Year to all. 2011 was a pretty miserable year in many ways, so here's hoping that 2012 will ... Mike Jonas | 3Jan12 | More
Geez, that's unbeilevbale. Kudos and such. Keischa | 17Dec11 | More
Thank you Mike,
On the third try you finally answered the question, sort of. "yes and no".
Just to be clear: ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
Joel - Everything that I have said concerning Michael Mann directly or indirectly has been about the science and the ... Mike Jonas | 12Dec11 | More
You requested: "Show me the science that is not so easily debatable, rather than debate the very debatable with esoteric ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
We're making some progress. You now say, "their numbers are correctly derived from their data using their stated methodology". ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
Joel - You have very conveniently ignored all the pertinent points from my last comment(s). A lot of what was ... Mike Jonas | 11Dec11 | More
You are misrepresenting the study again, and you're intelligent enough to know it.
From an article quoted on Watts's climate "skeptic" ... Joel | 11Dec11 | More
Joel - You ask "Is the science they did right?". They didn't do much science. The figures they ended up ... Mike Jonas | 10Dec11 | More
In my experience with the HIV-AIDS "skeptics" (yes they like being called skeptics too), their arguments typically diverge quickly from ... Joel | 10Dec11 | More
Joel - that was a long and passionate comment, but you aren't seeing the whole story.
Anthony Watts was very optimistic ... Mike Jonas | 10Dec11 | More
"Make the science unassailable with out needing to have majority political support."
Herein is the challenge. People make a very ... Joel | 9Dec11 | More
Joel, I thank you for all things that you voluntarily do and for the sincerity with which I trust you ... Chief Hypocrite | 9Dec11 | More
You pointed out that even the "science is settled crowd" is unwilling to make significant personal sacrifices to reduce ... Joel | 9Dec11 | More
wow, that was harsh. You posed a question, but provided only a partial recollection of the data, which in ... Joel | 8Dec11 | More
I find your argument tempting on the face of it, but it just doesn't stand up to inspection.
First, given that ... Joel | 8Dec11 | More
Sorry I was away and could not respond to your posting.
If I recall the glacier photographs (daguerreotypes) were ... elleno | 7Dec11 | More
Joel - it's mainly a matter of language.
"Global warming" doesn't mean "global warming" any more. It means "man-made [CO2] global ... Mike Jonas | 7Dec11 | More
The explanation for why the ocean warming cannot explain the time-scale of the observed trend is somewhat more detailed than ... Joel | 7Dec11 | More
Thank you from me and mine! Chief Hypocrite | 26Nov11 | More
Joel - apologies, somehow I missed your comments on 24 October. Briefly:
The sun's effect on global temperature over timescales longer ... Mike Jonas | 24Nov11 | More
Some good questions: "What is the ideal temperature for earth and when have we had it?" As humans we notice ... Chief Hypocrite | 24Nov11 | More
I love all the scientific garbledeegook. You're so much smarter than everyone else. I use to be a ... Max17 | 22Nov11 | More
Recently Gavin Polone, a manager and producer of Hollywood films wrote this in the Hollywood Reporter about Occupy Wall Street ... Chief Hypocrite | 6Nov11 | More
Chief, at lest your point comes across much more perspicuous this time. Although I may not agree with all of ... proletarian | 5Nov11 | More
Alan Greenspan once said something like, "if you understood what I said, I must have misspoken." He mistakenly thought he ... Chief Hypocrite | 5Nov11 | More
Telling them not to do drugs and then toking on a doobie at a party is also hypocitical. Hypocrisy is ... proletarian | 4Nov11 | More
Chief, I've read your article twice and find it more confusing the second time. It seems to be a little ... proletarian | 4Nov11 | More
Not a scientist just a 68 year old with some questions: 11 thousand years ago glacier national park was covered ... john grove | 3Nov11 | More
Lt., although I agree with your premise I believe what you are refering to is simply a by-product of what ... proletarian | 3Nov11 | More
The problem is not Capitalist.. The problem is not Socialists..
The problem is the constant 24/7 365 day a year bombardment ... Lt.Borgen | 3Nov11 | More
Can you tell us when the second photo in any of these sequences was taken? If the first ... Joel | 25Oct11 | More
Here is a conundrum for all the tub thumpers that believe in AGW as opposed to GW.
1. Around the world ... Ellen O'Day | 25Oct11 | More
Here's an interesting thought experiment. The Koch brothers have a strong financial interest in arguing that people are not ... Joel | 24Oct11 | More
I want to separately handle your repeated argument about solar activity. You claim that the fact that solar energy ... Joel | 24Oct11 | More