Buy a dime bag, kill someone
Email This Post
- 
Print This Post
-
Yep. Not your intention, for god’s sake, you just want to get high, feel good, have a profound experience or fabulous sex. Nothing wrong with that far as I am concerned cept it just fueled a circumstance that inevitably leads to someones death. No, of course not, that was not your intention you just wanted to have some fun, no harm, no foul kind of fun, unfortunately, it exists only in your mind
Grow up, you and we drug users are all hypocrites even if you and most have no clue what that means. regardless of how spiritual you claim to be.
In the failed war on drugs the biggest hypocrisy is that we do not bust the user all the time and every time.
You the user is the biggest hypocrite in the entire issue of illegal drugs.
Stop doing what you lie or rationalize or at least legalize drugs intelligently, with regulations, education and taxation. Continue to use illegal drubs while you fein to support or at least fund the the war on drugs and you the user of illegal drugs will own the title as the biggest social drug hypocrite, even if you make the money in the process and the pubic loves you. How low can you really go without knowing so?
To the selfish in the world, grow up. Someday the populace will catch up with your hypocrisy and it may not be pretty.
Comment by Johnny5 on 15 September 2009:
While some drugs like alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine are legal, others are not. Isn’t it hypocritical to slam “illegal” drugs for problems caused by them due to being “illegal” while you turn blind eye to problems caused by legal drugs? How many die every year from drunk drivers and fires caused by smoking?
If you really cared about reducing “illegal” drug crime, follow the path taken in 1930’s with alcohol. Legalize them. No longer will we have neighborhood gangs and organized crime. Even better, get those druggies addicted and overdoes all they want and die off. Get them off the gene pool and we’ll have a better society as a result.
Say yes to freedom.
Comment by Chief Hypocrite on 15 September 2009:
Johnny5, somewhat different language, but I think we generally agree on the best of the worst solutions available to us. The status quo is an embarrassment at best.
Specifically, we should only pass and then enforce laws that are enforceable. If we can’t enforce them do not pass them or change them for a better if not perfect solution. The status quo is killing us.
Forever prosecuting a multibillion dollar losing an extra-national supply side drug war without simultaneously ruthlessly cutting off the demand side, is a failed political solution to keep both extremes happy at an unconscionable price in treasure and ethics. To really work both sides we would become a police state few of us want.
This schizophrenic policy continues to give our enemies reason to showcase our hypocrisy and the damage we do to the foreign general populations that we want in our corner. Additionally we tell our own citizens, from grade school on, steal or sell enough drugs or live in the right area and make enough money, or know the right people so you get charges dropped or so you can afford the Finest Trial Lawyer money can buy to get you off when you are guilty. What a great lesson for our youth.
Justice is just another gigantic failed governmental policy, with monopolistic control, too big to fail or fix. It has other monopolies that are too big politically to fail, like the government in issuing mortgage securities, in running the post office, operating the passenger rail service, each activity that would be better in the private sector with proper governmental regulation,ie without winning in politics as the primary purpose for new laws, with all the disastrous conflicts of interests that introduces; ie one law for the consumer, one for that special interest, one law for business, and so on when all of the laws should be one rational, well read law balancing interests rather than playing the get even game on law at a time.
We are so doomed curretnly by government in their rush to get legislation passed to take credit for with incessant conflict of interests creating not reducing additional risks to the taxpayer. You see, if a government organization fails, the tax payer pays. If a governmental organization succeed it puts private enterprize out of business and government is now legislator, regulator and operator.
Fannie and Freddie as Government Sponsored Enterprises had a monopoly on the lucrative mortage secularization market because of the quasi governmental status or each. Banks and Wall Street could not compete with them for that part of the business for decades until the politicians of both parties wrote laws and regulations and did allowed private enterprise more competitive choices, and then did not regulate the increased government required of the GSEs which the Banks and Wall Street had figured out how to complete with.
Never compete with a loser.You both lose.
Starting in the early 1990s with the zenith reached in the middle 2000s greedy banks and wall street types found a way to compete with Fannie and Freddie. So how has that worked out for y’all?
When you or government competes with someone in business, you should not be allowed to make all the laws and the regulations too. It’s just crap whenever we do that.
Our war on drugs, begun in the 1960s is causing even more populations outside our borders to dislike us for our hypocrisy when we do not really enforce laws against usage on the demand side of drugs, right here in River City. What enforcement we do for political reasons,falls disproportionately and inconsistently mostly on the hoodies who are too stupid and poor to get away with it as most upper class richer users do all the time.
Any users, and that means you if the paraphernalia fits, who are not loudly supporting a practical, and properly regulated and controlled legalization, and all the politicians who also allowed the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac nexus of corruption with the government to exist and stands by speaking out of both sides of their mouth on drugs, another major nexus of corruption between government and illegal businesses, demonstrate the greatest of hypocrisy.
Really really, enforce completely on the demand side and turn us into a police state or legalize, regulate and tax and deal with the consequences in a straight forward intelligent manner.Opps, sorry, guess I am talking about government who wants to pass on the one hand laws that their consumer thinks are good and who also wants to pass laws on the other hand for the organized special social interests and business interests. Some of our politicians have three hands, one decidedly in our pocket by voting themselves salaries, whopper insurance and other benefits including retirements packages that look like thievery.