This guy is a real China correspondent?

Email This Post Email This Post - Print This Post Print This Post - Subscribe

This article, from BBC’s James Reynolds, is so incredibly bad that I’m going to give it its own post in the hopes that five days later, or whatever, I can revisit this and make sense of it. Why anyone would start a post-Closing Ceremony post like this –

It’s over.

In a state which has no God, the Olympics has been a religion - together with its own cathedrals, rituals, and sacred flames. Everyone in China was meant to be a worshipper. If you didn’t believe in the Games, you were dismissed as a heretic.

– is utterly beyond me. Only someone who has absolutely no idea what’s happening in Beijing — who hasn’t bothered talking to locals, many of whom say the Olympics are a hassle and are in fact not burned at any stake — can write something like that. If a blogger off the block said that, no one would bother. Reynolds, on the other hand, works for BBC, which makes this article utterly appalling.

It gets stranger from there… a cataloging of national leaders (”The King and Queen of Sweden sat a bit further back - democratically wearing their official Olympic accreditation round their necks”) followed by this observation:

The biggest cheer of the entire night came when David Beckham rose up from the 2012 bus (if ever China decides to hold elections, Beckham might have a reasonable chance of getting a seat on the Chinese Politburo).

Uh… really, James Reynolds, were you actually there? Or did you catch it on the tube from your favorite English pub?

And then this: “Then came the final moment of a decade of work. The Olympic flame (always known here as the ’sacred flame’) was put out.”

“Sacred flame” is a Chinese thing, huh? It’s not called the sacred flame because, say, that’s what it’s always been called, from the days it was lit by a High Priestess in Athens?

The reaction to the post has been, well… invisible. As of 9:18 p.m. Beijing time, there have been 67 comments — this is over a two-day period — and all of them look like this:

Xujun Eberlein, a notable blogger and author, linked to Reynolds’s abomination from her blog, Inside-Out China, with four words: “This one is hilarious.”

One way of putting it, I guess.

How does Reynolds’s blog post end? Oh but with a bang! Never mind ridiculous and ill-conceived…

A billion people will now have to find something else to believe in.

Post a Response

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image