Archive for August, 2008

A view from Ritan Park

A view from Ritan Park

Another absolutely beautiful day today. What would you have done with it?

Medvedev: Five International Principles

Russian President Medvedev stated in state controlled “Vesti News today that his nation will follow five principles in international affairs. In short,”multipolarity”, as he names it, in the world is fine, but unipolar decisions–even when issued by such a “powerful and authoritative” country as the US are unacceptable. Medvedev goes on to say that Russia does not seek conflict with any nation, US or Europe—BUT that it is an unconditional truth that Russian citizens living abroad will have their rights enforced.

He states further that Russia will develop positive relations with America “as feasible”.

The Marshall interprets this as “we will take Abkhazia and Moldova, beware in the Baltic States”. Diplomacy only succeeds to the extent of one’s military industrial might multiplied by its willpower [Clauswitz].

George W. Bush - A Shining Beacon to the World …


“I am not part of the problem. I am a

Republican.”

I thought it would be fun to show some of the misquotes by George W. Bush, the current guiding light of the free democratic world. I hope also to show and appreciate his world knowledge, geographical poise, intelligence, perception, communication abilities, humour, wit, compassion and his complete illiteracy from this article. I

will also be sprinkling Wikipedia extracts, images and performance statistics throughout the article. Most of these quotes have been attributed to Bush Jnr.

On Geopolitics:

“Iran’s Nucular Power Pants..”

“I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change.”

“Ariel Sharon of Israel is a Man of Peace”

“The problem with the French is that they don’t have a word for entrepreneur”

The inhabitants of Greece are Greecians”

“We have a firm commitment to NATO, we are a part of NATO. We have a firm commitment to Europe, we are a part of Europe.

Still America's most wanted?

“Mission Accomplished”

On Economics:

“The vast majority of our imports come from outside the country”

On the Environment:

“It isn’t pollution that’s harming the environment. It’s the impurities in our air and water that are doing it.”

Facts, Figures and Quotes by Bush

  • After training, he was assigned to duty in Houston, flying Convair F-102s out of Ellington Air Force Base. Critics allege Bush was favorably treated because of his father’s political standing, citing his lack of combat service and his irregular attendance.
  • Unemployment originally rose from 4.2 percent in January 2001 to 6.3 percent in June 2003, but subsequently dropped to 4.5 percent as of July 2007.Inflation-adjusted median household income has been flat while the nation’s poverty rate has increased.
  • Under the Bush Administration, real GDP has grown at an average annual rate of 2.5 percent, The Dow Jones Industrial Average has grown by about 30 percent since January 2001 and stock market indexes have risen.
  • By August 2007, due to increases in domestic and foreign spending, the National Debt had risen to US$8.98 trillion dollars, an increase of over 70% from the start of the year 2000 when the debt was US$5.6 trillion.

  • The National Debt is currently(2008) $9.5 trillion — and is increasing at $1.63 million every day. So the Bush Administration has allowed the National Debt to effectively double its National Debt during his two terms in office. They haven’t initiated any debt payback policies and any time the debt reaches its upper limit set by Congress — they just raise the bar again. The Debt to GDP ratio is given as the ratio of National Debt(only) against GDP. At the moment debt is 65% of GDP.
  • The current US Foreign or External Debt is currently about $13.773 trillion (Wikipedia) and as a rough estimate — about $2 bilIion dollars is leaving the US everyday.I have also had great difficulty finding any historical graphs for US Foreign Debt.

  • I am not so happy about this Debt to GDP ratio. To me — a debt is a total debt no matter how you look at it. So the Total Debt should be the National Debt + The Foreign Debt — which works out to $23.343 trillion. Current GDP for 2007 is 13.843 trillion. And if you work out the Total Debt to GDP ratio — that makes the Real Debt to GDP ratio: 23.343/13.773 X 100 which equals a Total Debt to GDP of 169%. Zimbabwe’s current national debt to GDP ratio is 211% and their inflation rate is in the millions!
  • In 2007, Bush opposed and vetoed State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) legislation, which was added by the Democrats onto a war funding bill and passed by Congress. The SCHIP legislation would have significantly expanded federally-funded health care benefits and plans to children of some low-income families from about 6 million to 10 million children.
  • The perception of President Bush’s effect on the economy is significantly affected by partisanship with 67% of Republicans and 1% of Democrats approving of his performance.

Bush’s Environmental Record:

  • Upon arriving in office in 2001, Bush stated his opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, an amendment to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change which seeks to impose mandatory targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, citing that the treaty exempted 80 percent of the world’s population and would have cost tens of billions of dollars per year. He also cited that the Senate had voted 95–0 in 1997 on a resolution expressing its disapproval of the protocol.
  • In 2002, Bush announced the Clear Skies Initiative, aimed at amending the Clean Air Act to reduce air pollution through the use of emissions trading programs. It was argued, however, that this legislation would have weakened the original legislation by allowing higher levels of pollutants than were permitted at that time. The initiative was introduced to Congress, but failed to make it out of committee.
  • Amidst high gas prices in 2008, Bush lifted a ban on offshore drilling. The move was largely symbolic, however, as there is still a federal law banning offshore drilling. Bush said, “This means that the only thing standing between the American people and these vast oil reserves is action from the U.S. Congress.”

Iran Preparing for War

Multiple sources point to Iran mine laying in Gulf, military exercises, bellicosity, and determination to be nuclear power at any cost.

A report from London says Western intelligence sources report Iran has engaged in a series of intensive exercises designed to enhance combat readiness for a war in the Gulf. The sources said Teheran has been steadily testing both regular military units as well as those of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. Gulf sources say Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps has been planting mines in the Gulf. Gulf Arab officials said most of the mines were placed in Iran’s territorial waters they also say Iran is preparing for war.

The U.S. Navy and its Western allies plan to deploy at least one additional strike carrier group in the Gulf and it is expected to arrive by mid-September.

At the same time a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies said Iran continues to supply weapons to Shi’ite militias in Iraq that continue to attack U. S., Iraqi and allied forces there.

Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf Says Iran About to be attacked.

Dutch intelligence sources say the US [or Israel] would decide within weeks to attack nuclear plants with unmanned aircraft to avoid endangering air crews.

Dutch AIVD Secret Service ultra-secret operation underway in Iran in recent years has been halted and an agent recalled in view of “impending US plans to attack Iran,” within weeks, writes Joost de Haas in the Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf. According to intelligence sources in the Netherlands, the US [or Israel] would decide within weeks to attack Iran’s nuclear plants with unmanned aircraft to avoid endangering air crews. The Israeli Air Force would be held back to defend Israel against retaliation.

Dep. Chief of Iran’s General Staff Masus Jazairi said Saturday, Aug. 30, that any attack on Iran would mean the beginning of a new world war.  Iran sources report that Jazairi’s attack aimed at confirming his credentials in Tehran during a major shakeup of the Iranian high command. Such speculation and recent polls that show support for Israel to defend itself against an Iran determined to get nuclear weapons as quickly as possible are believed to be behind the recent spate of threats by Iran.

In addition The Georgia quarrel has all but derailed US-Russian cooperation on the Iran issue. Moscow is not only pulling out of the diplomatic and sanctions front against Iran’s nuclear program; according to Russian sources, Moscow has decided to finally finish building Iran’s nuclear reactor in the southern town of Bushehr before the end of the year, after holding back for five years at Washington’s insistence. Saturday the Kremlin provocatively said it could “wipe-out” NATO’s Black Sea fleet in 20-minutes. That is seen as a threat against NATOs recognition of Ukraine or an offer for it to join the alliance that Russia adamantly opposes.

The presense of Russia workers in Iran finishing the nuclear reactor complicates an Israeli attack since Russian technicians could be killed or injured. Last Fall’s Israeli attacks on the North Korea build, Iranian financed nuclear reactor in Syria is believed to have killed or wounded North Korean, Iranian and perhaps Russian technicians and advisers.

If attacked Iran will likely try to block the Straits’s of Hormuz and that could easily lead to a confrontation with the U. S. Navy carrier task forces in the Persian Gulf.  The U. S. has said it will not allow the straits to be blocked.

Getting to know McCain’s VP “Mrs. Maverick.”

First official acts as governor was to sell on eBay a posh gubernatorial jet because it was wasteful.

Known, at times, as “Sarah Barracuda” because of her ferocity on the high school basketball court. As co-captain her senior year, Sarah Palin was a point guard who lead her team to its first state championship.

The nickname resurfaced when as a 28-year-old political novice City Council member she turned on a veteran blocking a bill that would have steered business to his garbage-hauling firm.

The moniker was revived again in 2003, when Alaska’s governor, whom she would later unseat, appointed her to a state oil-and-gas commission. As a brand-new member, she challenged the ethics of the panel’s leader, the chairman of state’s Republican Party, forcing him ultimately to resign.

Since long before she became Alaska’s youngest — and first woman let alone mother of five  – governor 20 months ago, Sarah Louise Heath Palin has been making her mark as an unlikely upstart. Friday, she did it again, accepting Sen. John McCain’s surprise offer to be his VP running mate.

A Saturday Washington Post article describes how Palin rose to the statehouse by challenging the corruption that has become endemic in Alaska, even if it meant taking on the Republican establishment there, including the former governor and the state’s congressional delegation.

Born in Idaho, Palin became an Alaskan as an infant when her parents, Chuck and Sally Heath, hauled their young family and their belongings up the Alaskan Highway. They settled eventually in Wasilla, about 45 miles north of Anchorage. Palin’s official biography describes it as a place with a “reputation for junky yards and cranky land-owners who didn’t mind using the serious end of a shotgun to run off trespassers.” Ivan Moore, a veteran political pollster in Anchorage, described Wasilla as “the most fearsomely conservative region of the state.” It is Alaska’s fastest growing city and where Sarah grew up and entered politics.

Her Dad was a science teacher and her mother became a school secretary. The family would go on camping trips to hunt moose, bear and sometimes wild sheep Palin likes to salmon fish in nearby Bristol Bay. She is a lifetime NRA member.

Her father was her track coach, and she played on the softball team, but her real passion was basketball. “She doesn’t like sitting on the sidelines,”says a friend. She was runner-up in Miss Alaska beauty pageant.

As a further example of Palin fitting the McCain maverick model her first official acts as governor was to sell on eBay a posh gubernatorial jet because it was wasteful.

First Poll With Palin Shows Her Stealing Barack’s Thunder

The most humorous if smart-alecky quip so far about Palin is: “As for qualifications, Sarah Palin shoots bears and moose.  Dick Cheney shoots birds and lawyers.  Sounds qualified enough to me.”

Although ex[ected to be rising the numbers are little changed since yesterday and show Barack Obama attracting 47% of the vote nationwide while John McCain earns 43%. When “leaners” are included, it’s Obama 49% and McCain 45%.

 Obama currently leads by thirteen points among women while McCain leads by six among men. Among white women, the candidates are essentially even while McCain holds a substantial lead among white men. Blacks overwhelmingly support Obama by over 90%.

 Rasmussen polls every evening sampling likely voters. The Gallup Poll  that polls registered voters has Obama leading by 7%.

 Sarah Palin who was introduced mid morning yesterday made a good first impression. She was unknown nationally before being introduced as the GOP Vice-Presidential pick but is now viewed favorably by 53% of voters nationwide. Her counterpart, Joe Biden, is viewed favorably by 48%.

 While Palin has made a good first impression, the more significant numbers will come a week from now after the nation has a chance to learn more about her. After last weeks Democrat Convention Obama is now viewed favorably by 57% of the nation’s voters, McCain by 55%.

Most expected Obama to get a bounce in the range of 10% but. the Palin VP announcement has clearly reduced the so-called Barack bounce.

Ray Charles Could See It

Six more Iranian nuclear reactors are to be built, according to Iranian and Israeli [Haaretz] sources. Iran, with an abundance of oil and other power solutions is building more reactors [peaceful purposes ?] just as the facility at Bushehr will come on line later this year with Russian help.

Iran boasted that its fighters can now strike Israel and return without refueling. This in a week that has seen Iran launch a dummy satellite from a new two stage rocket. Other claims have been made about shutting down the Straight of Hormuz–watch for $300 oil– and an implied ability to hit not only Israel but US bases in the middle east. Except for the extra reactors, none of this is new. Informed sources are betting on WAR. The only dispute is when and by what means.

Ray Charles could see this one coming.

American Politics and That Which is Owed…

“In a democracy, the people (always) get the government they deserve.” – Alexis de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in America,

http://www.sangrea.net/free-cartoons/daily-bias-democracy-is-not-dead.jpg

Being an Englishman and therefore European, I have always fully understood the importance of the United States as the hegemonic leader of the free democratic world. But what I fail to understand is the sheer tinsel “Hollywood” run-up to the actual Presidential elections.

Americans don’t seem to be bothered that millions and millions are spent on spin, media infighting and travel — money hugely wasted on these presidential candidates, money that could be so useful helping the American needy, particularly in these worsening economic times. The people place all their faith in one candidate and then rant and rave about their policies, leadership qualities and seem to trust them implicitly. Hope does have this effect on people, but the eventual reality can be so cruel. The real acid test is what the elected candidate will actually do when he or she becomes president. Isn’t this the whole point ? Put it this way, is there anybody out there who regrets the fact the Dubya was elected instead of Gore or Kerry in the last two presidential melees ? I, for one, cannot understand the reasons why the American public ever even considered Bush Jnr. His reign has been continually characterized by mumbling gaffs, bad grammar in full media view, apparently non-existent geopolitical knowledge, an unhealthy infatuation with World Terrorism, who supports outright torture, zero-level diplomacy, complete disrespect for the UN and therefore the International Community, shadow agendas and he is someone who has a distinct penchant for taking the Second Amendment to illegal international extremes. I surely don’t have to describe anymore do I ? It is notable that Colin Powell served briefly as Secretary of State in the Bush administration. His moderate and calm diplomatic voice was always at loggerheads with The Shrub. Powell was a man who fully understood both the necessity for National Security (having served very favourably as US National Security Adviser under Reagan), as well as for the clear need for the support of the international community. He had wide experience as well as  international respect. If ever a particular person should have become President of the United States — he was it. Simply because he had that international respect.

So, how could the American electorate get it so wrong ? How come the American Electorate actually trusted G. W. Bush and elected him to be President — and not just once but twice ?

In my thoughts and wonderings about all this, my conclusions seem to point to differences in personality and character regarding the Presidential front runners and not their policies. Or perhaps it’s just a case of “I have always been and always will be a Republican” and has nothing whatsoever to do with leadership qualities or policies ? Is this true ? I think it is. After the feckless leadership by Bush Jnr under the Republican flag, why else is McCain neck and neck with Obama ? It is certainly not based on Dubya’s winning Republican Presidential achievements is it ? And, as a comparison, how does Dubya compare with the present unpopular English leader and Labour PM — Gordon Brown? Both Bush Jnr and Brown compare very favourably in regard to current national hatred and dissent although, in terms of international respect, I would suggest that Gordon Brown is just a tad ahead. And I can safely tell you now that the Labour party in England has not got a cat in hellfire’s chance of winning the next election (even with a diffferent Labour leader) in 2010. It’s already a foregone conclusion. That is the punishment which is politically due to the Labour party(Brown’s party). But not so with the current Republican candidate and the American electorate. No, no — McCain will definitely be different…

So how do you find out what any presidential candidate stands for or what their policies are and, most importantly — Why ? Trouble is, the US system is not particularly transparent — not as transparent as the UK system anyway. Particularly in the support and funding by that candidates’ backers. It’s far less transparent in America. It even allows a running candidate such as Hillary Clinton and husband to refuse to declare their funding or earnings openly. In UK it is Law, any politician or political party must declare all earnings, funding and support.

Has Electorate America ever thought of looking “behind the door” to see who is supporting Obama or who is supporting McCain ? Who are the Oil Barons supporting or funding ? Who is Big Business funding or supporting ? Who is the Mafia supporting ? Who are the Green Ecos funding (indeed, have they got any money to do this?). Doesn’t this tell you anything significant about the real policies of the candidate? Remember that words are just that — words. But actions are the only thing that should ever convince us. Not high platitudes, plagiarism, promises, blah, blah. This, of course, is only a guarded European view.

But one thing I do know — the monetary candidate support from the Oil Barons, Big Business or Mafia or whomever can only mean one thing - Of this, I am sure…

Payback in full by any future American President.

Who does McCain think he’s fooling?

In my last article about women voting for McCain, I said that the candidate was banking on women not finding out his real position on issues such as abortion and birth control. Apparently, he also believes that his choosing a female running mate will help him win him the female vote; that it won’t matter where Governor Sarah Palin falls on women’s issues. Ladies, in short, John McCain thinks you don’t use your brains. I don’t believe for a minute that John McCain will fool the women of this country, and I cannot see Hillary Clinton’s supporters being star struck by his selection.

There’s not much to know about Sarah Palin’s background. Project Vote Smart sums it up on a single sheet. She was elected Governor of Alaska in 2006. Prior to that, she was the part-time Mayor of Wasilla City, Alaska, population 9,000. She holds a degree in Communications/Journalism from the University of Idaho. So, let’s get this straight: John McCain has been spending the better part of a year harping on Barack Obama’s youth and lack of foreign policy experience. Then he goes out and chooses a running mate younger than Obama with absolutely no foreign policy experience and precious little national political experience. (I don’t think a minor in political science counts.) Today John McCain turned 72. What happens if McCain becomes incapacitated during his term and we have to rely on President Palin? Think about it. How would she deal with, say, the two wars? How would she deal with Nouri al-Maliki? Or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? These are legitimate questions, given McCain’s age and his repeated bouts with melanoma, one of the most virulent forms of skin cancer. For the record, he has never fully come clean with his medical records. That issue, of course, just dropped by the wayside, deemed insignificant.

Here’s why John McCain thinks his choice will help him pull the wool over our eyes:

(1)Governor Palin is broadly viewed as a ‘reformer’ who exposed ethics violations in Republican state government. This, my friends, is the old ’straight talk express’ thing again. You know, McCain the Maverick. Now, he supposedly has a female straight talker. Yes, he told the media that he’s been seeking a running mate that can “best help me shake up Washington.” Who is he kidding? John McCain isn’t interested in shaking anything up. He has voted in step with George Bush more than 95% of the time. His plan is to follow through with and expand upon Bush’s eight years of failed policies.
(2)John McCain thinks he can have his cake and eat it too. He sees Governor Palin as a way to tempt disenfranchised Hillary Clinton supporters and pander to the Christian conservatives. In McCain’s warped mind, women are vacuous enough to support a woman simply because she’s a woman. Sarah Palin is an Evangelical Christian, a pro-creationist, an anti-abortionist, and a forced childbirth activist. I could be wrong, but I don’ t think her vision is shared by the majority of American women, let alone Hillary Clinton supporters.

The choice of Sarah Palin is living proof that McCain knows he must have the support of conservative Christians in order to move into his new digs at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Ralph Reed is positively gushing about Palin. “This is a home run. She is a reform governor who is solidly pro-life and a person of deep Christian faith.” He went on to describe Palin as one of the “bright shining new stars” in the Republican party. The GOP is barely recognizable anymore. It has become a party so tightly entwined with conservative religious ideology that it no longer carries the vision of serving all Americans.

A dose of reality

McCain professes “Country First” on his campaign web site. Let’s face it, people, this wasn’t a selection made with America’s best interest in mind. It may sound like a cliché but this is indeed a woman who is a heartbeat away from the presidency, a self-described “average hockey mom” with not one whit of real-world experience in foreign affairs, terrorism or the armed forces. Yet John McCain has boldly stated that she’s ready to be president. What’s he going to do? Send her to some kind of intensive training course for the first few months?

As recently as one month ago, Governor Palin didn’t have anything positive to say about the position she so willingly accepted today. She said the VP position didn’t seem “productive.” She also confessed that she doesn’t know much about what a vice president does. Although the Los Angeles Times refers to Palin as well-spoken, the convoluted reply she gave when asked about the possibility of being McCain’s running mate puts her right on par with George Bush in command of the English language:

“As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

Huh? I’d say the jury is still way out on how well-spoken she is.

Her whistleblower status is also at risk. Governor Palin is now herself under investigation for abuse of power. She is accused of firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan because he would not succumb to pressure and fire an Alaska state trooper involved in a nasty divorce from Palin’s sister. While she denies the allegations, the legislature has voted to hire an independent investigator to look into the matter. She has remained loyal to Senator Ted Stevens.

We simply can’t hear enough about Palin’s solidly Christian family life. She eloped with her childhood sweetheart. At 44, she’s the mother of five children ranging in age from 18 to 4 months. She’s known to Christian conservatives because of her refusal to have an abortion in spite of the fact that she was carrying a child (the 4 month old) with Down syndrome. Her eldest son is in the service and will be heading to Iraq on, you won’ t believe it, September 11th. In somebody’s mind, hers is the perfect embodiment of the American family unit. She will attempt to lure the female vote by claiming Hillary Clinton’s mantra about cracking the glass ceiling as her own. Don’t drink the Kool-Aid, ladies. Governor Palin is no greater a friend to women than is John McCain.

Palin is unwaveringly pro-life and does not support a woman’s right to choose. She is prominent member of Feminists for Life. She wants creationism taught in the classroom and is a forced childbirth activist. She is a woman who has no problem selling out womens’ rights. Does she sound like the type of candidate that the majority of American women would support? I think not. She is undoubtedly a choice designed to solidify support from the Republicans’ Christian conservative base.

So, now the Republicans have their hunk of history, and all I can say is I hope we don’t have to test her in the driver’s seat. McCain’s supposedly ‘bold’ move is less about putting a woman on the ticket than putting a Christian conservative on the ticket. If McCain wanted to shake things up by presenting a powerhouse ticket, he could have chosen Kay Bailey Hutchison or even Olympia Snowe. While even their selection would still not be enough to make me vote for McCain, these are at least women with proven track records and credibility. Their only drawback is that they do not share Sarah Palin’s ideology and extremism and were, therefore, unacceptable to McCain’s Christian base.

Ray Charles Could See It

Six more Iranian nuclear reactors are to be built, according to Iranian and Israeli [Haaretz] sources. Iran, with an abundance of oil and other power solutions is building more reactors [peaceful purposes ?] just as the facility at Bushehr will come on line later this year with Russian help.

Iran boasted that its fighters can now strike Israel and return without refueling. This in a week that has seen Iran launch a dummy satellite from a new two stage rocket. Other claims have been made about shutting down the Straight of Hormuz–watch for $300 oil– and an implied ability to hit not only Israel but US bases in the middle east. Except for the extra reactors, none of this is new. Informed sources are betting on WAR. The only dispute is when and by what means.

Ray Charles could see this one coming.

More coming soon. Hypocrisy.com

Welcome to hypocrisy.com .

Civilization’s Building Blocks

No, not Homer Simpson, he knows nothing about Hospitality, the foundation stone of civilization

One of the features of Homer’s Odyssey that few commentators mention is the play of hospitality and its opposite number, which is savaging the stranger. No less important a personage than Zeus was the patron god of hospitality in Bronze Age Greece, which is an indication of its importance to that culture. In fact, throughout the text Odysseus is warned that if he stays away from Ithaca too long his fate might resemble that of Agamemnon, murdered at a banquet to which he was lured, in a crass violation of the principle of hospitality. The Phaeacians treat Odysseus extremely well—and then are punished for it by Poseidon, the nemesis of Odysseus and his people. A son of Poseidon is Polyphemus, who, far from making a meal for Odysseus and his men, makes a meal of a number of them.

Meanwhile, the suitors—actually usurpers—in Odysseus’s court violate the principle of hospitality by helping themselves to vast amounts of the king’s food and wine in his banquet hall, and when Odysseus returns and wipes them out, he anticipates Beowulf’s cleansing of the mead hall many centuries later.

The theme of hospitality runs strongly through Hebrew culture as well. God sternly instructs his people to treat the stranger within their gates kindly because they were treatedTreat the stranger well so badly by the Egyptians. Sodom is seemingly destroyed as much for the crime of failing to meet the needs of the poor as for that of intended homosexual rape (Ezekiel 16:49-50). The theme then runs strongly through the New Testament as well. The Greek word for hospitality is philoxenia, which literally means “brotherly love for the stranger.”

Taking the world’s ancient literature as a whole, we might be justified in considering hospitality to be the very foundation stone of civilization. It seems just as clear, though, that the next building block is communion. Going back to the travails of Odysseus, we find that the best moments of his ten-year voyage of return are spent in the company of his hosts, eating, drinking and sharing the sort of stories that we pass around on the internet today. Our word symposium comes from the Classical practice of sitting around after a meal to drink and enjoy one another’s company. For their part, the Hebrews made the Passover meal an essential ceremony of their communal life, and significantly, that practice continues to this day. Furthermore, just as the great act of redemption depicted in the Hebrew Scriptures is commemorated by a meal, the great ceremony associated with the New Testament act of redemption is the Eucharist, which Jesus insisted his followers celebrate until his return.

Take this bread....Still there would appear to be one more step along the path to modern civilization, one more building block in its edifice. Beyond communion is the principle of dialogue, which is closely associated with Socrates as depicted in Plato’s writings, his Dialogues. The point is to allow the proponents of both sides of an issue to present their best arguments inAnd what do you have to say? the hope that in this way thoughts that might otherwise be missed, and thus cause trouble, will be brought out. The early experiment in democracy in Periclean Athens incorporated this principle, and the Roman Senate, as long as it lasted, attempted to abide by it as well. It was no coincidence, then, that the United States form of government was formed in the neoclassical era, when those ideas were being revived. Our checks and balances are supposed to function by way of dialogue across the aisles of the two houses of Congress, between those houses, and between the Congress and the executive and judicial branches of the government.

So where does the issue of those three building blocks of civilization stand at present? We have built our homes without those old front porches where people used to sit and expect their neighbors, out for an evening stroll, to join them for conversation and a glass of lemonade. Often our hospitality isn’t even extended to our own parents as we shove them into institutionalized living quarters because we’re simply too busy with our own lives to attend to them. In place of communion we have parties where social interaction often has less than ideal interpersonal overtones. Sometimes too we don’t arrive at dialogue because any disagreement is viewed as a threat to our self-esteem. We are expected to be so self-assertive that our goal becomes that of steamrolling over anyone else’s viewpoint. One of Robert F. Kennedy’s best points, as I understand it, was his practice of listening very intently to what people said to him.

I was appalled as I began offering what university catalogs list as graduate seminars, so-called because they were developed in a day when students were expected to have arrived at a level of scholarship where they could share and debate their developing opinions about a topic at hand. In my case that topic always had to do with the interpretation of a major work of Hispanic literature. I was appalled because I found my students terrified that they might express an opinion in a paper that was different from mine. I nearly tore my hair out trying to get across to them that if they could support their opinion it certainly did not have to correspond to mine. These Spanish masterpieces are all ambiguous, as is the case with all great literature for that matter, and I wanted them to know I was not so arrogant as to believe I had the final word of truth on them. Still, they insisted on attempting to parrot back what I had said. That is the state of dialogue in much of academia.

In the world’s epic literature, a hero emerges in the nick of time to save his or her civilization from the forces of chaos. That hero often begins by re-establishing hospitality, as in the case of Beowulf in the Danes’ mead hall, and that at least sets in motion the move to communion and dialogue. Perhaps we collectively need to be our own hero now.A hearty welcome from Beoulf

Hypocrisy in Time Travel

What a difference a debate can make

Douglas Adams’s Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has been mentioned before in this column. In the segment of that opus entitled The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, the remark is made that in order to cover the phenomenal cost of an evening at the restaurant, all one has to do is deposit a penny in a savings account before leaving one’s own era. Even at low interest, an unimaginably great amount of money will have been accumulated in the course of several billion years. (Never mind that many planets, including the earth, would have burned up in the interim, complete with their banks. This is comic science fiction, after all.)

This morning I asked a group of friends I was having coffee with what point in time they would choose to visit if they could travel to the past. Mostly they were bewildered by theOops, is it too late to fix it question, but some thought in terms of going back to an earlier point in their lives to remedy some error that had negative effects. The possibility of going back with a little information about what was going to happen in certain real estate markets was brought up.

24-30Being the student of the Bible that I am, I said one moment in time that I would dearly love to witness is the one related in Mark 7:24-30, in which a Gentile woman from Syrian Phoenicia approaches Jesus to ask him to come and heal her daughter. Jesus answers her in mock-prejudiced terms, telling her it just isn’t right to give the children’s bread to dogs.

This is a bright and spunky lady, though. She picks up on the fact that he doesn’t use the word for “dog” that the Jews usually use for Gentiles, meaning a filthy, mangy scavenger. Rather, he uses the word for a little lap dog, a pet. She says, I’m sure with an ornery glint in her eye, “Yes, Lord, but even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”

Jesus obviously loves her answer, and tells her to go home because her daughter is well. I’m convinced that Jesus was doubled over laughing when he told her he was granting her request. That is why I’d like to see that scene as it took place.

Many people, though, would like to go back to certain turning points in history and watch, for example, a great general going through the agony of trying to out-think his adversary, perhaps bringing his knowledge of chess to bear. I would love to see Alexander the Great debating with his trusted second-in-command, Parmenio, before the Battle of Gaugamela, about what to do when King Darius’s chariots charged. One might even speculate that Alexander’s father, Philip, whose name means “lover of horses,” wasn’t named in vain, and that he had told Alexander that horses would not charge into an enclosure surrounded by lances. In any case, what a moment of inspiration it must have been when the idea was put forward of directing those chariots into U-shaped formations in order to stop the horses and chariots and slaughter their occupants. For that matter, I would like to see Alexander’s face as he made the hard decision to return and support Parmenio, who was in trouble, rather than pursue and kill Darius.

Following the Battle of Waterloo, Wellington called it “a damned close-run thing,” and some practical people might well choose to go back to tip the scales on other “damned close-run things,” so that some of the worst horrors of history might have been avoided.

Of course, some physicists have felt time travel into the past must be impossible for the simple reason that, what with the butterfly effect in operation (a butterfly in BeijingSmall events have long tails today may affect weather conditions in New York City a month from now), any slight change in the events back there would radically change our circumstances today. The example most often given is that of a deranged person’s going back to kill his/her father before he could generate a child. The thing ends in paradox. Those who hold to the many-worlds theory, though, have no such problem; in an event of that sort the world without the patricide simply splits off from the one from which the time traveler departs.

Where some serious hypocrisy might enter the picture, however, is if someone imbued with radically postmodern values might travel back to the point at which the United States Constitution is being generated and make an impassioned speech about how many points in it will be considered embarrassing in what he firmly believes is a more enlightened, relativistic age. It’s something to think about.

Thanks Obama - Now I remember why I am a Republican

When I first heard the soaring rhetoric of Senator Obama I was not only impressed but I was starting to be convinced that he should be the next President. Until last night. Once he got past the historical implications of his running and into the heart of his speech I was reminded why I was proud to be a Republican. I not only disagreed with much he said but I actually felt disenfranchised. That not only did I not belong with the Democrat Party but that they thought I was radioactive and wouldn’t take me even if I wanted to join them.

My whole career has been spent climbing the corporate ladder. I got pretty far and am damn proud of it. In fact I would give anything to be back there and only a serious health problem could have taken me out of the life I loved, the corporate life. But to a Democrat, according to Obama, I felt as if I were anathema to the thousands there last night. As if I were that mean old Mr. Potter to Obama’s George Bailey.

Perhaps it was no mistake, even 60+ years ago, that nasty Mr. Potter owned a bank and foreclosed on homes. For here we are again, half a century later and Obama is talking about yet another mortgage crisis and people losing their homes. Having worked in the banking industry I can tell you that most of the employees are nice, not mean, but the banks did make some really stupid decisions. Not only did they offer loans to high risk customers, but then they began to keep much less in their loan loss provision in order to artificially inflate their profits.

But what gets me is that when I went house hunting, I recognized that I had a budget; that I couldn’t afford my “dream” home or take on a monthly payment that would be a stretch. I purchased a more modest house that was within my budget. So why should I now be asked to help pay the outrageous mortgage of someone who bought a house they couldn’t afford in the first place? That just doesn’t seem right.

I also wonder if Obama does tax the big corporations, well, after more than 25 years working for them, I know what they will do. Part of the increased expense will come from increasing the prices of their products, but a big portion will come from salary freezes or even layoffs. Thanks Obama.

Perhaps I sound as cold hearted as Mr. Potter or as awful as the epitome of the mean business person, Scrooge. Yet I have to agree with Scrooge when he said, “Don’t I pay taxes?” We pay a hell of a lot more taxes now than back then and still it isn’t enough to help the poor and underprivileged. I guess the root of it is I don’t mind helping someone if they are also trying to help themselves. I often gave a helping hand to people climbing the corporate ladder by boosting them up another rung through training and education. I had a young single mother working for me and each year I often gave her bonuses and high pay raises not because of her personal situation but because she worked hard and deserved it. But none of that seems to count according to the Democrats.

Am I a Scrooge or another Mr. Potter? I don’t know. But thanks to Obama, I remember now why I am a proud Republican. I believe in rewarding people based on their hard work and effort. Not simply because they have their hand out and never because they have a knife to your back demanding that you pay them.

I don’t buy into Obama’s and Al Gore’s unrelenting diatribes about how awful everything is and that we are faced with never ending doom and gloom. I truly believe this is still a land of opportunity. And with the first African American running as President against a senior war hero and a woman VP, how can you not be inspired by the greatness of this country and the unending possibilities?

Palin Is No Skrinking Violet

“It’s nonsense not to tap a safe domestic source of oil. I think Americans need to hold Congress accountable on this one,” Gov. Palin (R) Alaska

While serving as Mayor of her hometown SARAH PALIN grew frustrated with Alaska’s “good ol’ boy” style of governance — so she did something about it. in 2006 running against and defeating popular former Democratic Gov. Tony Knowles by a 5 to 4 margin.

This former beauty queen is no shrinking violet she is a woman who hunted moose with her Dad; is a lifelong NRA member, hunts, fishes, was an aggressive, champion basketball point guard; is pro-life and believed in a strong military and sound energy policy including getting government out of the way.

Palin is Alaska’s first woman chief executive, and at 42-years old its youngest Governor ever. The now 44-year-old mother of five adds a strong conservative presence to the GOP ticket. Palin tells Newsmax that it’s high time Congress allows the development of Alaska’s wealth of oil and gas. She doubts global warming stems from human activity, and she considers herself both a fiscal and social conservative.

Palin told NEWSMAX for its September issue “It’s nonsense not to tap a safe domestic source of oil. I think Americans need to hold Congress accountable on this one.” During her agreement speech to become the first woman ever to be the Republican party’s Vice Presidential slot Friday morning she said she will “take the message of reform to every corner of America.”

McCain Makes Surprise VP Pick

Women Will Support Palin Pick - It is TKO For Hillary. Scroll to bottom for issue polling

In a surprising even stunning move Senator John McCain has picked first term Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his VP nominee. Palin is a former beauty queen 44-year old mother of five (the youngest just 4 months old , the oldest enlisted in the Army and is deploying to Iraq next month). This pick can make a BIG move toward McCain among women..

Palin is about as far outside the beltway as you can be and still be on the same side of the planet. She is an outspoken maverick who attacked corruption in local and state government. She has no foreign policy experience leaving open the way to contrast her with Obama’s own absense of experience. Palin is a lifelong NRA member.

The ticket is already being portrayed as a Grand father-Grand daughter ticket. One thing is certain Palin is a hell-of-a-lot better looking than the sour-pussed, Bassett-looking Biden

Today Barack Obama attracts 46% of the vote nationwide while John McCain earns 43%. When “leaners” are included, it’s Obama 49% and McCain 45%. This is Obama’s biggest lead since late July, when he opened up a six-point advantage following his summer speech in Berlin. Other data released this morning shows that Democrats are happier now than before the convention with the choice of Joe Biden as Obama’s running mate. Overall, 74% of Democrats say their convention has unified the party. Obama is viewed favorably by 56% and McCain by 53%. The so-called Barack bounce is far less than predicted.

Trust on Issues

McCain

Obama

Economy

48%

42%

National Security

52%

41%

Energy

42%

45%

Ethics

39%

46%

Iraq

46%

43%

Immigration

39%

38%

Environment

36%

51%

Balance Federal Budget

42%

40%

Trade Agreements

40%

42%

Taxes

43%

40%

Social Security

40%

40%

Healthcare

41%

45%

Education

35%

48%

Abortion

39%

41%

The Right to Be Silly

What do we not believe about Irans' promise to destroy Israel?

A couple of decades back, Time had an essay on everyone’s inviolable right to be silly.

Some pretty good examples were given, and I recall being impressed with the idea.  Over the years since then I’ve noticed, too, that the tendency is becoming pronounced.  I mean, do we really believe that buying the product being advertised on the TV screen will change our lives from black and white to color?  Does the average golfer really believe that a $3000 set of clubs will improve his game?

For that matter, look at World War II and the events preceding it.  Neville Chamberlain decides to ignore Hitler’s Mein Kampf and brings back a piece of paper in which Der Furor (sic) assures him that he has no intention of implementing Operation Sea Lion.  Then there was that grand tradition of Russian heads of state who believed anything German heads of state told them:

“Don’t worry, Alexandra my love.  Yes, it’s true that we have to hide the girls when Wilhelm is here for a visit, but he’s my cousin!  Wilhelm would never attack my country.  We grew up playing together.”

KABOOM!

So, following the lead of Nicolas, Stalin ignores Mein Kampf and makes a mutual non-aggression pact with Hitler, even though he’s not sure he can really trust him.

KABOOM!

The French, for their part, feel immensely secure behind their formidable, heavily-manned Maginot Line.  (Maginot is French for “imaginary.”)  Picture the scene in Nazi headquarters:

“Well, gee whillikers, Heinz, whatever shall we do about the Maginot Line?”

“Golly, you don’t suppose we could go around it, do you, Fritz?”  Lots of knee-slapping laughter here, along with crude comments with drunken Umlauts on them.

Then there was the Polish cavalry.  You have to give them credit, because they were brave beyond belief, but charging horses into the face of German tanks, after all, fellas.  I’m told it had to be done because normal Polish strategy was inextricably bound up with charging horses.  Still, didn’t it occur to anyone to change that procedure before the Panzers got there?

As the Allies move on east, SHAEF headquarters receives word that the Germans might counterattack.  “Naw,” says the staff, “they’re too weak to bring it off.”

“Uh, say, General, we seem to be looking, you know, at a whole lot of German ghosts from World War I or something, rumbling through these here, you know, impassible forests?  By the way, can ghosts blow our vehicles fifty feet in the air?”

INCOMING!

Battle of the Bulge.  Didn’t anyone in that office remember that a fundamental principle of German warfare is that after you retreat the first thing you do is counterattack?  I mean, get out a copy of Clausewitz, guys.

Then there were silly weapons.  The Japanese sent those balloons over in hopes that they’d ignite all the forests in the northern United States and seriously cripple the country.  Hey, trust me, Tojo, if our lightning-induced forest fires don’t do it, little items from your fireworks warehouses certainly won’t.  Oh, yes; there were those pigeons that were supposed to nest in wooden Japanese houses so their incendiary bombs would set the places afire, and in tests they nearly burned a nearby military base down.  And what is this about B-29s bombing a moving Japanese fleet from several miles up?  It was probably a coincidence that some of the bombs came within a mile or two of the ships.

The raid on Anzio wasn’t all that bright either, and there’s at least speculation that it was doubts about its efficacy that caused the Brits to send Canadian troops in there to be slaughtered wholesale.  That’s pretty hypocritical silliness if you ask me.

But when the radical Muslims say about a hundred times a month that they’re going to destroy Israel and then the United Stat