I’m Voting For Liberty In November
Email This Post
-
Print This Post
-
It’s been a while since I poured you all a morning cuppa. Despite being motivated a few times to rant about something, I have let myself get distracted. But, I’m on a roll, today, so when I saw the following post, I was motivated to add my two cents (for what it’s worth).
TruthNews.us: FISA: Why I Can No Longer Vote for Barack Obama
Barack Obama lost my vote today. I was never a rah-rah supporter, yet prior to the FISA bill vote today, I believed that I could suck it up and vote for whoever ended up being the eventual Democratic Party nominee. For the first time in my adult life, I’m faced with the unhappy prospect of staying home on November 4th.
If I had written the above linked post, I would have named it “Why I Can No Longer Vote For A Democrat or a Republican”.
It’s just this kind of thing (letting the FISA bill pass) that is a regular reminder to me that our legislators, when given the chance, rarely, if ever do the right thing (unless some lobbyist is “paying” them to do so). This past year has been more apparent than ever that Democrats are just as guilty of bending over as many Democratic supporters have been accusing the Republicans of being.
When a constitutional scholar, such as Barack Obama, cannot be bothered to vote against a law that is blatantly unconstitutional, that is just another sign to me that our politicians do not work for “We, the people”.
The ultimate kick in the teeth is that everybody’s favorite Democrat-to-hate, Hilary Clinton, voted against it (head meet desk)!
Today, Barack Obama shed his skin; the skin that enticed so many people into believing that he did, in fact, support the United States Constitution, and in particular, the fourth amendment to same.
Why has he lost my vote? Quite simply: trust. If I can’t trust a self-described constitutional scholar to defend basic constitutional principles, even with a vote on the losing side of a constitutional issue, how can I trust him with (for example) future Supreme Court nominations? After today, I can’t.
Even though the FISA bill would have passed without Obama’s vote, it seems to me, if he wanted to prove that he was a REAL candidate for change, he would have voted AGAINST it, on principle alone (not to mention all his supporters who expressed their distaste for his stance on the bill on his very own campaign website). That might have made me warm up to him a little more.
Instead, this latest vote just gave me one more reason not to cast my vote for him. If I can’t trust him while he is on the road to the presidency, why would I give him the reins to my prized horses? Sure, he might take good care of my mares for a while, but how long before he sells them to the highest bidder with some pitiful excuse about how he would have fought harder to keep them for me, but the amendments that would have kept them in a decent stall, failed, and he couldn’t think of anything else to do, so he sold them anyway.
I know that Obama’s FISA vote won’t mean a thing to his hard core supporters. They’ll make excuses the same way that George W. Bush’s sycophants make excuses for him. “Oh, he had to vote this way, or the GOP would paint him as soft on national security.”
NEWSFLASH: THE GOP IS GOING TO USE THAT PAINTBRUSH ANYWAY.
The FISA vote today made absolutely no difference in the GOP’s “weak on terror” mantra. That’s why it’s so hard to fathom Obama’s yea vote on the FISA bill. In fact, the GOP is already casting him as a flip-flopper on the issue: He was against warrentless wiretapping before he was for it. He was against telecom immunity before he was for it. So where does Barack Obama really stand?
The Republicans may be jerks, but Democrats seem to be spineless twits when it comes to voting for/against things that really matter to the American people. Of course, when it comes to voting for/against something that the lobbyists want, we can always count on both parties to bend over and kiss our rights “good-bye”.
With that in mind, and with the recent capitulation of the Democrats who were voted into office with very little problem, last election, there is nothing anybody can say to me to convince me that a vote “for” a Democratic candidate is any better than a vote for a Republican candidate. They are both equally guilty of sending our rights down the crapper. Under Bill Clinton, we got “welfare reform” that has put millions of poor families out on the street with help because their “right” to benefits ran out. We got, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” which is proving to be a thorn in the military’s side as they attempt to retain soldiers to fight GWBs wars. We also got “The Defense of Marriage Act” which, in one fell swoop took away the rights of gay men and women to ever marry and made it harder for them to fight for the right. (No need to mention Waco or Elian). All these things happened under a Democratic president.
Thanks to the events of September 11, 2001 and everybody’s least favorite Republican, George W Bush, all of the above issues were made worse. The poor economy means that “welfare reform” policies are going to hurt even more. DADT, will force more commanders to discharge gay soldiers during a time of long-term war(s), when we need every able bodied volunteer, regardless of sexual orientation. DOMA is being constantly addressed, all over the country (every election cycle, all over the country, state versions of DOMA are being put on the ballot to be laced into state constitutions in an attempt to make it permanent). Add “sayonara habeas corpus” and “howdy illegal wiretaps” (no need to mention crappy administration lackeys and federal contractors feeding at the trough without fear of recrimination). The Republicans claimed they would bring credibility and trust back to the White House (no thanks to Bill and Monica) and they took Clinton’s ball, ran with it, and then took the goal posts and hid them.
I have a black cat, named, Liberty. I think this year, instead of voting for Evil or Lesser Evil, I’ll vote for “Liberty” for the first time. It won’t do a damn bit of good, of course, but neither will my vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
(Crossposted…)
Comment by julie hershey on 15 July 2008:
Hi Dizzy,
I share your disappointment in Obama’s latest vote. I am especially surprised that, of all the reactions i have read on this issue, most readily interpret the violations of the first and fourth amendments, yet not one has mentioned the denial of due process to all American citizens by immunizing the big corporations from legal repercussions. Though I am not a legal expert, I think the ACLU has a case here! No matter, they’ve had many such cases in the last eight years; any rulings in their favor have been nothing more than hollow victories.
This is as far as I will allow my cynicism to go, however. I will still vote for Obama, for there is much, much undoing of the tangled web this deceptive administration has woven that must yet be accomplished, and I do believe a democratic president is the only hope we have to detangle the mess. I am a crazy cat lady, but much as I suspect I would adore Liberty, a vote for her is also a vote for McCain. There will never be a perfect candidate, but, given at least what we are led to believe at present, if McCain wins we will find ourselves sinking more deeply into the quagmire of corporatocracy and abandonment of our constitution, this as we wear the blood of thousands more human beings dying for no verifiable benefit to global stability.
We must all realize that voting our conscience is no longer about what is best for ourselves as individuals and families, no longer about protesting our lack of ideal choices. Today we are faced with an extreme threat to the common good, the likes of which have not existed in this country for almost 60 years. Voting our conscience must mean NOT voting for the candidate that ensures our trajectory will gain velocity.
Please reconsider and join me, Dizzy.
Comment by Dizzy Dezzi on 15 July 2008:
Julie, I can appreciate your desire to continue to vote for the lesser of two evils in order to avoid the “evil” of another Republican presidency. But, with all that’s happened with both the Republicans and Democrats in just the last ten years, people asking me to vote for either party is tantamount to asking me to choose to sniff coke or shoot up heroin. Neither will (likely) kill me right away and they might even make me feel good when I take that first hit. But, a little ways down the road, I will come to regret taking that first hit and wish that I had just stuck with something that will take a lot less control over my life (rather, that is far less addictive). I say no thanks to any of those choices. I may not change the world with my vote for my cat (or NOTA or a third-party), but I will vote my conscience before I ever vote for a Democrat or a Republican, again. YMMV.
Comment by julie hershey on 15 July 2008:
Hello again, Dizzy. My point was that regardless of how we vote, whether Obama, McCain, Liberty, 3rd party, or even opting not to vote in this election, we are truly voting only for Obama or McCain, and will have that snort or hit or shot forced upon us hook or by crook. We are married to this two party system for better or for worse, at least presently.
Barring the possibility that the last election was taken, our votes do indeed impact the direction we are led as a people, albeit in small increments. In other words, with some critical analysis of our issues, which both of us have obviously engaged in, we do in fact lead our destiny. Sad to say the events of the last eight years were determined in 2000 by a combination of greed, complacency and reaction to the sexual indiscretions of Bill Clinton, and not by our opinions on NAFTA, welfare reform, or anything that mattered. As long as most Americans could continue to live high off the hog on credit and feel they were achieving uppercrust status, their motto was “What, me worry?” The silver lining in all of this may be that finally, many are beginning to realize that there is ample cause to worry.
Of course, there are still the foolish voters who associate either candidate with a random string of personal fears or attractions, but it’s been a long time since we’ve witnessed the heart-felt involvement of so many people in issues other than their pocketbooks and disdain for extra-marital trysts made public.
I agree with you that there are definite reasons to be disillusioned, and perhaps I am a naive optimist, but I still feel it is important to use whatever means are availabe to us to save our flailing democracy before it breathes its last breath.
I liked your analogy of the snort or shoot. Since we’re on that topic, may I offer one of my own? When I was a sophomore in college (1973), I went on a camping trip with a few friends. The event turned out to be a huge party of about a hundred people, and wouldn’t you know it, (because I didn’t, at first) someone spiked the burgers! Needless to say, that was some camping “trip.” I would have preferred the burger without the condiments, but was not given that option, and declining the burger was also not possible since I’d already eaten it. I was about to travel a long road, like it or not, so my only choice was to make it as pleasant a ride as possible, and hope I made it home safely.
Whatever you decide to do this election year, Dizzy, please know that your column and the others on this site are giving thousands of us information and inspiration.
Comment by Dizzy Dezzi on 16 July 2008:
Julie, thanks for your comments and your story about your “trip” which also makes an apt analogy. You are right, we are all strapped into the two party system, regardless if we have the munchies and long for something much different. It would be nice if politicians didn’t spike the kool-aid once they are elected (a sad, sad, fact of life).