Predicting the future…I hope!

Email This Post Email This Post - Print This Post Print This Post - Subscribe

dadI was trying to find any significant “CHANGE” that Barrack Obama had initiated while in the Senate. He’s always talking about and promising change. Since no one will ask him to be specific about change and no one will ask him why he hasn’t initiated any change yet as a Senator (see my post earlier this month) I thought that maybe he had and I’d missed it. Well there is one change he’s proposed. Its called Senate Bill 2433, The Global Poverty Act of 2007.

Senate Bill 2433, the Global Poverty Act of 2007, would “require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.” Did you get that? We, you and me, the American taxpayer, are to pay for this.

The most liberal Senator (in 2007 anyway) wants to buy the affection and love of the rest of the world and he wants you and I to pay through the nose for it. Forget the fact that the United States feeds more of the world and sends more foreign aid to the world than any other county. Forget the fact that it is the United States that props up the vaunted United Nations. It appears that Obama and other liberals think we should literally pay the world’s way out of poverty. One of those liberals is Joe Biden.

Please note that this bill proposes nothing for the poverty stricken here. Nothing for Appalachia, nothing for the border slums in our southwest, nothing for the urban slums or the rural poor here in the United States. When you read the words “worldwide” and “global” in this legislation read “everywhere but here”.

There has been some research into this legislation. Cliff Kincaid, of Accuracy in Media, studied this bill and he reports that it is “[A] hugely expensive bill and was quickly passed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. In his column posted on the Accuracy in Media web site, Kincaid noted that Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was trying to rush Obama’s ‘Global Poverty Act’ (S. 2433) through his committee without hearings. The legislation would commit the US to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the US already spends,” on foreign aid. “It was scheduled for a Thursday vote but was moved up a day, to Wednesday, and rushed through by voice vote. However, Kincaid found that conservative Senators have now put a ‘hold’ on the legislation, in order to prevent it from being rushed to the floor for a full Senate vote.” Now, the House passed this bill in September. It’s now getting rushed through the committee in the Senate, the Biden committee, to soak the US taxpayers again to fund global, liberal, feel-good garbage.

While watching National Geographic and the Discovery Channel on tv I see these primitive tribes from South America, Africa and the Pacific. They live on less than $1 a day and the world is trying everything it can to maintain their lifestyle. Are we Americans going to force them out of it? There is massive abject poverty in Brazil and Argentina and Venezuela. Why don’t those governments do anything about it? Well, in Venezuela’s case we know why.

I’m all for helping poverty stricken areas. Right here in the United States. Long term welfare isn’t the answer. Go to any government housing project and look around. It isn’t working. Change that, Obama.

There Are 3 Responses So Far. »

  1. Have you actually listened to yourself? Read what you wrote? Governments have always used food and aid to negotiate terms with other countries. Particulary poorer ones run usually by tyrannts we helped install. Helping other nations isn’t bad. Nor is helping the poor here. There is a reason aid does not work in bringing people out of poverty and that can be found looking into the mirror. Your own attitude is one that is popular among the Republicans. I get mine and everyone else can go f themselves. Very unchristian. Very greedy. Yet so Bushie like. Give us a break….Your tax paying dollars have gone on much worse things than humanitarian efforts. Perhaps ravaging a poor nation so a few fat rich guys can keep their earnings up through Halliburton -is one feat that doesn’t seem to be bothering you. Or all those bushies being sent over to wine and dine in the safe green zone. I hear they like their whores to be sweet young girls. You know the ones that are told to screw or be sent outside the safety zone where they are sure to be killed. You people bitching and moaning about tax dollars going to needy places yet you have been robbed blind and screwed hard (no lube) by your bush pide piper. Funny yet so sad.

  2. You with your masquerading
    And you always contemplating what to do
    In case heaven has found you can’t you see
    That it’s all around you so follow me

    Hey come on, babe follow me
    I’m the Pied Piper follow me
    I’m the Pied Piper and I’ll show you where it’s at
    Come on, babe can’t you see
    I’m the Pied Piper trust in me
    I’m the Pied Piper and I’ll show you where it’s at girl
    Don’t be scared to move
    Hey, babe what are you trying to prove
    It ain’t true that your life has kicked you
    It’s your mind and that’s all that’s tricking you
    So step in line

    Come on, babe follow me
    Come on, babe trust in me
    Come on, babe can’t you see
    Come on, babe follow me
    I’m the Pied Piper

  3. What in the world are you talking about mandm069? You sure went off on a rant. Glad I could provide fuel for your fire and I hope you feel better.
    Actually what I was pointing out was that Obama hasn’t fostered any “change” as he promises even though he’s been in the US Senate for over 3 years and was in the Illinois congress even longer. He does want to spend our money elsewhere instead of here at home. We have plenty of poverty to address right here.
    You did make another point that I’ve made before. When there is no substance to their argument liberals will resort to profane and personal attacks.
    Can anyone out there point to one new idea, one piece of “change” that Obama has initiated? He’s certainly been in a position to and he promises…well wait…exactly WHAT is he promising? Any specifics out there? Any plan? Or just promises…promises that he has not explained how he would pay for.

Post a Response

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image