Cuba Aborts Future Welfare Babies

December 21st, 2007 • Jimmy Justo

Maybe it never occurred to Michael Moore in his embarrassing movie Sicko, to inquire into possible reasons why Cuba reports such a low infant mortality rate.

Wonder if Moore knows why his movie is banned in Cuba? Or not scheduled for release yet in England?

Cuba’s primary tool to achieve this low reported mortality rate is not hospital cleanliness or well paid doctors. It is because of government “encouraged” abortions anytime there is risk to a normal birth of ANY kind including social risk.

Social risk occurs whenever the child is being born to any mother who is not capable of supporting her child, in the opinion of the government. There is no need for welfare in Cuba. Oh, and it’s never too late to use any methods necessary per reports that have real credibility and Michael should have known about.

Is it possible that in the pursuit of money and influence, Moore withheld anything that did not support his cause?

Does Michael want our government to provide such unrequested abortion services to American citizens in future health care reforms?

Does Moore support such government driven social killing? How could that be?

Why? To wield power or to get the attention he missed on his first firthday?

Wow, is it even possible?

Where is the social justice, transparency and benefit to the average guy in all this?

Last 5 posts by

Post a Response

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Back To Hypocrisy.com    Communities: