History has already been made when Hills took the lead in most polls, the first time for any party in the US has such a leading female candidate. It is noteworthy also that for the first time, the majority of voters in American either believe or fear that she will become president.
Being a republician {senior citizen} woman who enjoyed a properous life style while Bill Clinton was president and became a rabid supporter, I am sickened by the low lever he has stooped to become a second-rate candidate for his wife. He may be winning a battle or two but does he care that he is also losing the chance to keep us from voting in a Democat for president???/ Hillary could never win a general election as she continues to refresh our memories of Whitewater, the oval office, blue dress, cigars, etc… can’t someone give him a glimpse of the overall picture and, perhaps remind him what a field day the general election will drudge up???? She couldn’t even find papers in the living quarters of the white House and now she is using White House experience on her resume??? Please, please, please!!!!!!
Post a Response
Recent Comments
Hey Snark, you double posted this. Anyway, here's a couple facts for you. 90% of shooting of blacks are commmitted ... proletarian | 11May12 | More
President Obama is a wonderful family man... I don't understand how anyone could assert otherwise. What are the facts that ... Sabrina | 10Apr12 | More
Fine work, Prole! I should have consulted you before I wrote the column! Keep reading, my old friend. Snark Twain | 19Mar12 | More
Snark my friend, I didn't know anyone ever read "The Devil's Dictionary" other than myself. Here's a couple, let me ... proletarian | 16Mar12 | More
oh yeah - one more thing, in the 1970s the corporate sham media widely publicized the danger of a fast-approaching ... Timmy Bippy | 7Mar12 | More
Oil is a filthy destructive fuel that empowers the elite, increases food prices, and destroys our water, land, and air. ... Timmy Bippy | 7Mar12 | More
paul - For a view of temperature & CO2 over the last 600 million years see:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100103072337/http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/historical_CO2.html
(click on the graph to ... Mike Jonas | 1Mar12 | More
im no scientist or clever guy but i do have a question on climate change millions of years ago was ... paul | 27Feb12 | More
We now have the "scandal" that Heartlands is funding anthropogenic climate change denial research, which is presented as proof positive ... John Theophilus | 15Feb12 | More
If I owe $100 to Tom but Harry owes me $100, the situation is the same as if Harry owed ... zam | 7Feb12 | More
Again, if you don't mind, a short follow-up Mr. Snark. Please forgive me for being so circumlocutory in my response. ... proletarian | 28Jan12 | More
Hey Snark, good to hear from you. I have a confession to tell. Whether I agree or disagree with your ... proletarian | 28Jan12 | More
Now don't do anything drastic, Prole! I remember some of my more fringy friends on the left wing fringe ... Snark Twain | 26Jan12 | More
Dave - you are quite right. I have tried a few times to explain to Joel that the issue is ... Mike Jonas | 21Jan12 | More
Joel and Mike: Gentlemen, you're getting hung up on the wrong issue. The issue is NOT the validity or ... Dave | 21Jan12 | More
Sorry Mr. Snark, I'd like to do a little follow-up if you don't mind. I refuse to vote for Mitt, ... proletarian | 13Jan12 | More
Oh, my, my, my, Mr. Snark -- always a pleasure to read you. As usual you have been very eloquent ... proletarian | 13Jan12 | More
Joel - your habit of portraying criticisms of scientists' work as ad hominems is getting ridiculous.
All of the data used ... Mike Jonas | 4Jan12 | More
Mike:
You claim BEST used the same data as previous studies. This is disingenuous and borders on a lie. ... Joel | 4Jan12 | More
Happy New Year to all. 2011 was a pretty miserable year in many ways, so here's hoping that 2012 will ... Mike Jonas | 3Jan12 | More
Geez, that's unbeilevbale. Kudos and such. Keischa | 17Dec11 | More
Thank you Mike,
On the third try you finally answered the question, sort of. "yes and no".
Just to be clear: ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
Joel - Everything that I have said concerning Michael Mann directly or indirectly has been about the science and the ... Mike Jonas | 12Dec11 | More
Chief:
You requested: "Show me the science that is not so easily debatable, rather than debate the very debatable with esoteric ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
Mike,
We're making some progress. You now say, "their numbers are correctly derived from their data using their stated methodology". ... Joel | 12Dec11 | More
Joel - You have very conveniently ignored all the pertinent points from my last comment(s). A lot of what was ... Mike Jonas | 11Dec11 | More
Mike,
You are misrepresenting the study again, and you're intelligent enough to know it.
From an article quoted on Watts's climate "skeptic" ... Joel | 11Dec11 | More
Joel - You ask "Is the science they did right?". They didn't do much science. The figures they ended up ... Mike Jonas | 10Dec11 | More
Mike,
In my experience with the HIV-AIDS "skeptics" (yes they like being called skeptics too), their arguments typically diverge quickly from ... Joel | 10Dec11 | More
Joel - that was a long and passionate comment, but you aren't seeing the whole story.
Anthony Watts was very optimistic ... Mike Jonas | 10Dec11 | More
"Make the science unassailable with out needing to have majority political support."
Herein is the challenge. People make a very ... Joel | 9Dec11 | More
Joel, I thank you for all things that you voluntarily do and for the sincerity with which I trust you ... Chief Hypocrite | 9Dec11 | More
Hi Chief,
You pointed out that even the "science is settled crowd" is unwilling to make significant personal sacrifices to reduce ... Joel | 9Dec11 | More
Ellen,
wow, that was harsh. You posed a question, but provided only a partial recollection of the data, which in ... Joel | 8Dec11 | More
Mike,
I find your argument tempting on the face of it, but it just doesn't stand up to inspection.
First, given that ... Joel | 8Dec11 | More
@Joel
Sorry I was away and could not respond to your posting.
If I recall the glacier photographs (daguerreotypes) were ... elleno | 7Dec11 | More
Joel - it's mainly a matter of language.
"Global warming" doesn't mean "global warming" any more. It means "man-made [CO2] global ... Mike Jonas | 7Dec11 | More
Mike,
The explanation for why the ocean warming cannot explain the time-scale of the observed trend is somewhat more detailed than ... Joel | 7Dec11 | More
Thank you from me and mine! Chief Hypocrite | 26Nov11 | More
Joel - apologies, somehow I missed your comments on 24 October. Briefly:
The sun's effect on global temperature over timescales longer ... Mike Jonas | 24Nov11 | More
Some good questions: "What is the ideal temperature for earth and when have we had it?" As humans we notice ... Chief Hypocrite | 24Nov11 | More
I love all the scientific garbledeegook. You're so much smarter than everyone else. I use to be a ... Max17 | 22Nov11 | More
Recently Gavin Polone, a manager and producer of Hollywood films wrote this in the Hollywood Reporter about Occupy Wall Street ... Chief Hypocrite | 6Nov11 | More
Chief, at lest your point comes across much more perspicuous this time. Although I may not agree with all of ... proletarian | 5Nov11 | More
Alan Greenspan once said something like, "if you understood what I said, I must have misspoken." He mistakenly thought he ... Chief Hypocrite | 5Nov11 | More
Telling them not to do drugs and then toking on a doobie at a party is also hypocitical. Hypocrisy is ... proletarian | 4Nov11 | More
Chief, I've read your article twice and find it more confusing the second time. It seems to be a little ... proletarian | 4Nov11 | More
Not a scientist just a 68 year old with some questions: 11 thousand years ago glacier national park was covered ... john grove | 3Nov11 | More
Lt., although I agree with your premise I believe what you are refering to is simply a by-product of what ... proletarian | 3Nov11 | More
The problem is not Capitalist.. The problem is not Socialists..
The problem is the constant 24/7 365 day a year bombardment ... Lt.Borgen | 3Nov11 | More
Hi Ellen,
Can you tell us when the second photo in any of these sequences was taken? If the first ... Joel | 25Oct11 | More
Here is a conundrum for all the tub thumpers that believe in AGW as opposed to GW.
1. Around the world ... Ellen O'Day | 25Oct11 | More
Here's an interesting thought experiment. The Koch brothers have a strong financial interest in arguing that people are not ... Joel | 24Oct11 | More
Mike:
I want to separately handle your repeated argument about solar activity. You claim that the fact that solar energy ... Joel | 24Oct11 | More
Hi Mike,
I'm sorry, but I find the accusations you're making to be just not credible. You are accusing a scientist ... Joel | 24Oct11 | More
Joel - Your last comment has only just appeared in my inbox, yet shows before mine in the blog. Not ... Mike Jonas | 23Oct11 | More
Joel -
>>>"I trust you’re offended at the person who made the initial claims way up at the top of this ... Mike Jonas | 22Oct11 | More
By the way: when an oil company funds a skeptic researcher to investigate global warming, they don't expect this answer, ... Joel | 22Oct11 | More
So I'm going to respond to a few of the points made above.
Mike: I'm glad you acknowledge that ... Joel | 22Oct11 | More
Chief, everyone has the right to express their opinions, and as long as it does not endanger anyone else that ... proletarian | 13Oct11 | More
Pingback by Flash: Just in on Iowa Caucauses : Hypocrisy.com on 19 December 2007:
[...] Hillary came out of the starting gates strong, then O’bomer closed ranks and it looks like JohnWords is going to surge ahead. [...]
Pingback by MOST UNLIKEABLE : Hypocrisy.com on 23 December 2007:
[...] In keeping with the Hills Introduction here. [...]
Comment by Management on 20 January 2008:
This was posted by Margie in “Bloomers & Newts, Oh My”
Being a republician {senior citizen} woman who enjoyed a properous life style while Bill Clinton was president and became a rabid supporter, I am sickened by the low lever he has stooped to become a second-rate candidate for his wife. He may be winning a battle or two but does he care that he is also losing the chance to keep us from voting in a Democat for president???/ Hillary could never win a general election as she continues to refresh our memories of Whitewater, the oval office, blue dress, cigars, etc… can’t someone give him a glimpse of the overall picture and, perhaps remind him what a field day the general election will drudge up???? She couldn’t even find papers in the living quarters of the white House and now she is using White House experience on her resume??? Please, please, please!!!!!!